🇺🇸 Ashburn Ping & Network Latency (IAD) | AS203314
Ashburn (IAD) ping, RTT, jitter and packet loss, theoretical fiber floor, and route efficiency to 18 Hats Network (AS203314) backbone PoPs.
🇺🇸 Ashburn (IAD)
Ashburn, Virginia is the heart of "Data Center Alley" — the densest interconnection ecosystem on earth. Hats Network peers at multiple carrier hotels within the region.
This page provides round-trip time (RTT) latency metrics between the Ashburn (IAD) PoP and every other node on the Hats Network (AS203314) global backbone.
PoP Highlights
- Location: Ashburn, USA (North America)
- Region: North America
- Role: Backbone interconnection point for Hats Network (AS203314)
- Public city reference: GeoNames 4744870 — 39.04372, -77.48749
- Coverage: RTT measurements to 18 other PoPs across 4 continents
Latency Summary
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Fastest Route | 🇺🇸 Ashburn (IAD) → 🇺🇸 New York (NYC) (6 ms) — Ultra-Low |
| Slowest Route | 🇺🇸 Ashburn (IAD) → 🇸🇬 Singapore (SIN) (215.9 ms) |
| Average RTT | 111.1 ms |
| Average Jitter | 0.89 ms |
| Average Packet Loss | 0.03% |
| Best Fiber Efficiency | 81.7% |
| Intra-Region Peers | 4 PoPs in North America |
| Total Routes | 18 outbound / 18 inbound (100% coverage) |
Jitter, packet-loss, percentile, and trend fields are estimated comparative indicators. Read the theoretical fiber latency methodology.
Outbound Latency from Ashburn (IAD)
Round-trip time in milliseconds from Ashburn to all other backbone PoPs, sorted fastest to slowest.
| Destination | RTT (ms) | Fiber Floor | Efficiency | Jitter | Loss | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 New York (NYC) | 6 | 3.44 ms | 57.3% | 0.12 ms | 0% | Ultra-Low |
| 🇺🇸 Miami (MIA) | 33.5 | 14.62 ms | 43.6% | 0.27 ms | 0.03% | Excellent |
| 🇺🇸 Los Angeles (LAX) | 59.7 | 35.84 ms | 60% | 0.31 ms | 0% | Excellent |
| 🇺🇸 Seattle (SEA) | 61.8 | 36.27 ms | 58.7% | 0.7 ms | 0% | Excellent |
| 🇬🇧 London (LON) | 71.1 | 58.1 ms | 81.7% | 0.53 ms | 0% | Excellent |
| 🇳🇱 Amsterdam (AMS) | 75.4 | 60.94 ms | 80.8% | 0.89 ms | 0.03% | Excellent |
| 🇫🇷 Paris (PAR) | 75.7 | 60.73 ms | 80.2% | 0.85 ms | 0% | Excellent |
| 🇩🇪 Frankfurt (FRA) | 80.6 | 64.3 ms | 79.8% | 0.87 ms | 0.07% | Good |
| 🇫🇷 Marseille (MRS) | 86.7 | 65.34 ms | 75.4% | 0.69 ms | 0% | Good |
| 🇩🇪 Berlin (BER) | 86.8 | 66.05 ms | 76.1% | 0.92 ms | 0% | Good |
| 🇧🇷 São Paulo (GRU) | 107.5 | 74.79 ms | 69.6% | 0.89 ms | 0% | Good |
| 🇷🇺 Moscow (MOW) | 113.6 | 76.88 ms | 67.7% | 0.8 ms | 0% | Good |
| 🇯🇵 Tokyo (TYO) | 150.9 | 106.69 ms | 70.7% | 1.14 ms | 0.16% | Fair |
| 🇹🇼 Taipei (TPE) | 180.1 | 123.78 ms | 68.7% | 0.83 ms | 0% | Fair |
| 🇭🇰 Hong Kong (HKG) | 194.1 | 128.37 ms | 66.1% | 1.38 ms | 0.09% | Fair |
| 🇦🇺 Sydney (SYD) | 195.4 | 153.48 ms | 78.5% | 1.46 ms | 0% | Fair |
| 🇦🇺 Melbourne (MEL) | 204.3 | 160.09 ms | 78.4% | 1.22 ms | 0.04% | Fair |
| 🇸🇬 Singapore (SIN) | 215.9 | 152.14 ms | 70.5% | 2.1 ms | 0.05% | Fair |
Inbound Latency to Ashburn (IAD)
Round-trip time in milliseconds from all other PoPs to Ashburn. Network paths may be asymmetric — inbound and outbound RTT can differ for the same city pair.
| Source | RTT (ms) | Fiber Floor | Efficiency | Jitter | Loss | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 New York (NYC) | 6 | 3.44 ms | 57.3% | 0.12 ms | 0% | Ultra-Low |
| 🇺🇸 Miami (MIA) | 33.7 | 14.62 ms | 43.4% | 0.38 ms | 0% | Excellent |
| 🇺🇸 Los Angeles (LAX) | 59.7 | 35.84 ms | 60% | 0.43 ms | 0% | Excellent |
| 🇺🇸 Seattle (SEA) | 61.8 | 36.27 ms | 58.7% | 0.62 ms | 0% | Excellent |
| 🇬🇧 London (LON) | 71.2 | 58.1 ms | 81.6% | 0.8 ms | 0% | Excellent |
| 🇳🇱 Amsterdam (AMS) | 75.4 | 60.94 ms | 80.8% | 0.6 ms | 0.16% | Excellent |
| 🇫🇷 Paris (PAR) | 75.7 | 60.73 ms | 80.2% | 0.38 ms | 0% | Excellent |
| 🇩🇪 Frankfurt (FRA) | 81.2 | 64.3 ms | 79.2% | 0.66 ms | 0% | Good |
| 🇩🇪 Berlin (BER) | 86 | 66.05 ms | 76.8% | 0.54 ms | 0.06% | Good |
| 🇫🇷 Marseille (MRS) | 86.9 | 65.34 ms | 75.2% | 0.81 ms | 0.06% | Good |
| 🇷🇺 Moscow (MOW) | 112.6 | 76.88 ms | 68.3% | 0.81 ms | 0.09% | Good |
| 🇧🇷 São Paulo (GRU) | 128 | 74.79 ms | 58.4% | 0.83 ms | 0% | Good |
| 🇯🇵 Tokyo (TYO) | 149.4 | 106.69 ms | 71.4% | 1.74 ms | 0% | Good |
| 🇹🇼 Taipei (TPE) | 180.8 | 123.78 ms | 68.5% | 0.96 ms | 0% | Fair |
| 🇭🇰 Hong Kong (HKG) | 194 | 128.37 ms | 66.2% | 1.62 ms | 0.13% | Fair |
| 🇦🇺 Sydney (SYD) | 195.6 | 153.48 ms | 78.5% | 1.53 ms | 0% | Fair |
| 🇦🇺 Melbourne (MEL) | 202.7 | 160.09 ms | 79% | 1 ms | 0% | Fair |
| 🇸🇬 Singapore (SIN) | 215.8 | 152.14 ms | 70.5% | 2.14 ms | 0% | Fair |
North America Peers
Ashburn is one of 5 Hats Network PoPs in North America. Intra-region routes offer the lowest latency and highest path diversity.
| PoP | Code | Country | RTT (ms) | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Los Angeles (LAX) | LAX | USA | 59.7 | Excellent |
| 🇺🇸 Miami (MIA) | MIA | USA | 33.5 | Excellent |
| 🇺🇸 New York (NYC) | NYC | USA | 6 | Ultra-Low |
| 🇺🇸 Seattle (SEA) | SEA | USA | 61.8 | Excellent |
Data auto-generated on July 19, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix for side-by-side comparison across all 19 PoPs.
🇫🇷 Paris Ping & Network Latency (PAR) | AS203314
Paris (PAR) ping, RTT, jitter and packet loss, theoretical fiber floor, and route efficiency to 18 Hats Network (AS203314) backbone PoPs.
🇺🇸 Los Angeles Ping & Network Latency (LAX) | AS203314
Los Angeles (LAX) ping, RTT, jitter and packet loss, theoretical fiber floor, and route efficiency to 18 Hats Network (AS203314) backbone PoPs.