Hats Network | LogoHats Network
NetworkLatencyPairs

Marseille to Ashburn Latency, Ping & RTT | AS203314

Marseille to Ashburn ping and RTT: 86.9 ms, 0.81 ms jitter, 65.34 ms fiber floor, and 75.2% efficiency across AS203314. Updated 2026-07-19.

πŸ‡«πŸ‡· This page compares the published ping and round-trip time (RTT) from Marseille (MRS) to πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Ashburn (IAD) with vacuum and optical-fiber physical limits.

Latency Summary

MetricValue
RTT86.9 ms
Jitter0.81 ms
Packet Loss0.06%
Standard Fiber Floor65.34 ms
Fiber Efficiency75.2%
Latency TierGood
Source RegionEurope
Destination RegionNorth America

Theoretical Fiber Latency

The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Marseille (43.29695, 5.38107) and Ashburn (39.04372, -77.48749). It does not disclose either facility address.

Physical ReferenceValue
WGS-84 geodesic distance6,672.7 km
Vacuum RTT floor44.52 ms
Standard fiber RTT floor (ng=1.4679n_g=1.4679)65.34 ms
Low-latency fiber material floor65.08 ms
Engineering floor (5% path allowance)68.62 ms
Research 1.33Γ— mapped-fiber reference86.91 ms
Estimated unamplified path loss1401.3 dB
Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers88 / 87
Published RTT inflation over fiber floor1.33Γ—

Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.

Stability & Trend

The following estimated indicators summarize route stability for the current publication period and are intended for comparative planning rather than SLA evaluation.

Stability IndicatorValue
Minimum RTT86 ms
Median RTT (p50)86.8 ms
95th percentile RTT (p95)88.2 ms
Maximum RTT88.7 ms
Jitter0.81 ms
Packet loss0.06%

RTT trend

Estimated route stability across the selected time window.

Average
86.9 ms
Minimum
86.0 ms
Maximum
87.6 ms
Average loss
0.01%

Route Context

About This Measurement

Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. Stability indicators are comparative estimates, and none of these values is an SLA.


Data auto-generated on July 19, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.

On this page