Hats Network | LogoHats Network
NetworkLatencyPairs

Ashburn to São Paulo Latency, Ping & RTT | AS203314

Ashburn to São Paulo ping and RTT: 107.5 ms, 0.89 ms jitter, 74.79 ms fiber floor, and 69.6% efficiency across AS203314. Updated 2026-07-19.

🇺🇸 This page compares the published ping and round-trip time (RTT) from Ashburn (IAD) to 🇧🇷 São Paulo (GRU) with vacuum and optical-fiber physical limits.

Latency Summary

MetricValue
RTT107.5 ms
Jitter0.89 ms
Packet Loss0%
Standard Fiber Floor74.79 ms
Fiber Efficiency69.6%
Latency TierGood
Source RegionNorth America
Destination RegionSouth America

Theoretical Fiber Latency

The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Ashburn (39.04372, -77.48749) and São Paulo (-23.54750, -46.63611). It does not disclose either facility address.

Physical ReferenceValue
WGS-84 geodesic distance7,637.7 km
Vacuum RTT floor50.95 ms
Standard fiber RTT floor (ng=1.4679n_g=1.4679)74.79 ms
Low-latency fiber material floor74.49 ms
Engineering floor (5% path allowance)78.54 ms
Research 1.33× mapped-fiber reference99.48 ms
Estimated unamplified path loss1603.9 dB
Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers101 / 100
Published RTT inflation over fiber floor1.44×

Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.

Stability & Trend

The following estimated indicators summarize route stability for the current publication period and are intended for comparative planning rather than SLA evaluation.

Stability IndicatorValue
Minimum RTT106.3 ms
Median RTT (p50)107.3 ms
95th percentile RTT (p95)108.7 ms
Maximum RTT109.3 ms
Jitter0.89 ms
Packet loss0%

RTT trend

Estimated route stability across the selected time window.

Average
107.5 ms
Minimum
106.6 ms
Maximum
108.3 ms
Average loss
0.01%

Route Context

About This Measurement

Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. Stability indicators are comparative estimates, and none of these values is an SLA.


Data auto-generated on July 19, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.

On this page