Hats Network | LogoHats Network
NetworkLatencyPairs

Ashburn to Hong Kong Latency, Ping & RTT | AS203314

Ashburn to Hong Kong ping and RTT: 194.1 ms, 1.38 ms jitter, 128.37 ms fiber floor, and 66.1% efficiency across AS203314. Updated 2026-07-19.

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ This page compares the published ping and round-trip time (RTT) from Ashburn (IAD) to πŸ‡­πŸ‡° Hong Kong (HKG) with vacuum and optical-fiber physical limits.

Latency Summary

MetricValue
RTT194.1 ms
Jitter1.38 ms
Packet Loss0.09%
Standard Fiber Floor128.37 ms
Fiber Efficiency66.1%
Latency TierFair
Source RegionNorth America
Destination RegionAsia Pacific

Theoretical Fiber Latency

The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Ashburn (39.04372, -77.48749) and Hong Kong (22.27832, 114.17469). It does not disclose either facility address.

Physical ReferenceValue
WGS-84 geodesic distance13,108.8 km
Vacuum RTT floor87.45 ms
Standard fiber RTT floor (ng=1.4679n_g=1.4679)128.37 ms
Low-latency fiber material floor127.86 ms
Engineering floor (5% path allowance)134.81 ms
Research 1.33Γ— mapped-fiber reference170.73 ms
Estimated unamplified path loss2752.9 dB
Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers173 / 172
Published RTT inflation over fiber floor1.51Γ—

Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.

Stability & Trend

The following estimated indicators summarize route stability for the current publication period and are intended for comparative planning rather than SLA evaluation.

Stability IndicatorValue
Minimum RTT192.4 ms
Median RTT (p50)194 ms
95th percentile RTT (p95)196.2 ms
Maximum RTT197.2 ms
Jitter1.38 ms
Packet loss0.09%

RTT trend

Estimated route stability across the selected time window.

Average
194.3 ms
Minimum
192.5 ms
Maximum
195.8 ms
Average loss
0.03%

Route Context

About This Measurement

Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. Stability indicators are comparative estimates, and none of these values is an SLA.


Data auto-generated on July 19, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.

On this page