Hats Network | LogoHats Network
NetworkLatencyPairs

Los Angeles to Ashburn Latency, Ping & RTT | AS203314

Los Angeles to Ashburn ping and RTT: 59.7 ms, 0.43 ms jitter, 35.84 ms fiber floor, and 60% efficiency across AS203314. Updated 2026-07-19.

🇺🇸 This page compares the published ping and round-trip time (RTT) from Los Angeles (LAX) to 🇺🇸 Ashburn (IAD) with vacuum and optical-fiber physical limits.

Latency Summary

MetricValue
RTT59.7 ms
Jitter0.43 ms
Packet Loss0%
Standard Fiber Floor35.84 ms
Fiber Efficiency60%
Latency TierExcellent
Source RegionNorth America
Destination RegionNorth America

Theoretical Fiber Latency

The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Los Angeles (34.05223, -118.24368) and Ashburn (39.04372, -77.48749). It does not disclose either facility address.

Physical ReferenceValue
WGS-84 geodesic distance3,660.1 km
Vacuum RTT floor24.42 ms
Standard fiber RTT floor (ng=1.4679n_g=1.4679)35.84 ms
Low-latency fiber material floor35.7 ms
Engineering floor (5% path allowance)37.64 ms
Research 1.33× mapped-fiber reference47.67 ms
Estimated unamplified path loss768.6 dB
Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers49 / 48
Published RTT inflation over fiber floor1.67×

Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.

Stability & Trend

The following estimated indicators summarize route stability for the current publication period and are intended for comparative planning rather than SLA evaluation.

Stability IndicatorValue
Minimum RTT59.1 ms
Median RTT (p50)59.6 ms
95th percentile RTT (p95)60.3 ms
Maximum RTT60.8 ms
Jitter0.43 ms
Packet loss0%

RTT trend

Estimated route stability across the selected time window.

Average
59.7 ms
Minimum
59.1 ms
Maximum
60.3 ms
Average loss
0.02%

Route Context

About This Measurement

Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. Stability indicators are comparative estimates, and none of these values is an SLA.


Data auto-generated on July 19, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.

On this page