Miami to Tokyo Latency, Ping & RTT | AS203314
Miami to Tokyo ping and RTT: 157.9 ms, 1.81 ms jitter, 117.71 ms fiber floor, and 74.5% efficiency across AS203314. Updated 2026-07-19.
πΊπΈ This page compares the published ping and round-trip time (RTT) from Miami (MIA) to π―π΅ Tokyo (TYO) with vacuum and optical-fiber physical limits.
Latency Summary
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| RTT | 157.9 ms |
| Jitter | 1.81 ms |
| Packet Loss | 0.16% |
| Standard Fiber Floor | 117.71 ms |
| Fiber Efficiency | 74.5% |
| Latency Tier | Fair |
| Source Region | North America |
| Destination Region | Asia Pacific |
Theoretical Fiber Latency
The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Miami (25.77427, -80.19366) and Tokyo (35.68950, 139.69171). It does not disclose either facility address.
| Physical Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| WGS-84 geodesic distance | 12,019.9 km |
| Vacuum RTT floor | 80.19 ms |
| Standard fiber RTT floor () | 117.71 ms |
| Low-latency fiber material floor | 117.24 ms |
| Engineering floor (5% path allowance) | 123.61 ms |
| Research 1.33Γ mapped-fiber reference | 156.55 ms |
| Estimated unamplified path loss | 2524.2 dB |
| Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers | 158 / 157 |
| Published RTT inflation over fiber floor | 1.34Γ |
Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.
Stability & Trend
The following estimated indicators summarize route stability for the current publication period and are intended for comparative planning rather than SLA evaluation.
| Stability Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Minimum RTT | 155.5 ms |
| Median RTT (p50) | 157.7 ms |
| 95th percentile RTT (p95) | 160.3 ms |
| Maximum RTT | 162.3 ms |
| Jitter | 1.81 ms |
| Packet loss | 0.16% |
RTT trend
Estimated route stability across the selected time window.
- Average
- 157.7 ms
- Minimum
- 156.1 ms
- Maximum
- 159.6 ms
- Average loss
- 0.02%
Route Context
- Departure PoP: Miami (MIA)
- Destination PoP: Tokyo (TYO)
- Region overview: North America β Asia Pacific
- Full global matrix: Backbone Latency Matrix
- Physical methodology: Theoretical Fiber Latency
Related City-Pair Routes
- Reverse direction: Tokyo to Miami latency and RTT β 156 ms
- Miami to Ashburn latency and RTT β 33.7 ms
- Miami to New York latency and RTT β 40.6 ms
- Miami to Los Angeles latency and RTT β 57.6 ms
- Miami to Seattle latency and RTT β 82.1 ms
- Miami to London latency and RTT β 101.7 ms
About This Measurement
Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. Stability indicators are comparative estimates, and none of these values is an SLA.
Data auto-generated on July 19, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.