Hong Kong → Tokyo, Japan RTT
Measured ICMP echo RTT from Hong Kong (Hong Kong) to Tokyo, Japan: 44.9 ms average, 0% loss, and excellent latency in round 2026-08-16T04:07:28Z.
🇭🇰 Hong Kong (HKG) → 🇯🇵 Tokyo, Japan (TYO)
Measurement round: 2026-08-16T04:07:28Z.
In round 2026-08-16T04:07:28Z, ICMP echo requests from Hong Kong to Tokyo returned a 44.9 ms average RTT, with a 42.32 ms minimum, a 50.91 ms maximum, and no lost packets. The 1.82 ms standard deviation and 1.6 ms jitter confirm a stable intercity path, matching the excellent latency tier.
This path is the third fastest among the 19 outbound routes measured in this round. Its variability ratio of about 4.1% sits slightly above the network-wide median of 3.28%, so the route is fast but not the most uniform in the set.
Against the 2,883.5 km great-circle distance, the vacuum floor is 19.24 ms and the fiber floor is 28.24 ms. The observed RTT is 1.59 times the fiber floor, a fiber efficiency of 62.9%, indicating the route tracks a realistic regional fiber path with little excess delay.
Latency Summary
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| RTT | 44.9 ms |
| Jitter | 1.6 ms |
| Packet Loss | 0% |
| Standard Fiber Floor | 28.24 ms |
| Fiber Efficiency | 62.9% |
| Latency Tier | Excellent |
| Source Region | Asia Pacific |
| Destination Region | Asia Pacific |
Ping Measurement Series
The chart below renders the 50-sample ICMP echo measurement round for this route; an accessible table of every sample is included with the chart.
Ping series: HKG → TYO
50 ICMP echo samples at 100 ms intervals · round 2026-08-16T04:07:28Z · avg 44.9 ± 0.26 ms (SE)
Sample distribution: box = interquartile range (43.9–45.6 ms), median 44.5 ms · whiskers = min–max · diamond = round average · each dot is one measured sample.
How to read this chart
The shaded band spans the measured minimum to maximum RTT of all samples collected up to that point, and the thin line traces the running average. The final position therefore matches the round statistics exactly — the band only widens when a new extreme sample arrives.
The dashed line is the round average, and the shaded band at the bottom is the theoretical fiber-optic floor (28.2 ms) for this route.
Full 50-sample dataset
| Seq | Offset (ms) | RTT (ms) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 42.32 |
| 2 | 100 | 43.23 |
| 3 | 200 | 43.96 |
| 4 | 300 | 43.19 |
| 5 | 400 | 46.08 |
| 6 | 500 | 44.07 |
| 7 | 600 | 44.70 |
| 8 | 700 | 43.16 |
| 9 | 800 | 43.96 |
| 10 | 900 | 45.04 |
| 11 | 1000 | 44.82 |
| 12 | 1100 | 45.89 |
| 13 | 1200 | 45.41 |
| 14 | 1300 | 44.11 |
| 15 | 1400 | 50.91 |
| 16 | 1500 | 45.81 |
| 17 | 1600 | 45.48 |
| 18 | 1700 | 44.42 |
| 19 | 1800 | 47.90 |
| 20 | 1900 | 44.93 |
| 21 | 2000 | 43.58 |
| 22 | 2100 | 46.05 |
| 23 | 2200 | 43.65 |
| 24 | 2300 | 43.42 |
| 25 | 2400 | 44.47 |
| 26 | 2500 | 45.40 |
| 27 | 2600 | 43.38 |
| 28 | 2700 | 44.39 |
| 29 | 2800 | 44.51 |
| 30 | 2900 | 44.30 |
| 31 | 3000 | 44.51 |
| 32 | 3100 | 43.87 |
| 33 | 3200 | 44.02 |
| 34 | 3300 | 44.54 |
| 35 | 3400 | 43.20 |
| 36 | 3500 | 43.04 |
| 37 | 3600 | 44.05 |
| 38 | 3700 | 43.01 |
| 39 | 3800 | 48.87 |
| 40 | 3900 | 45.66 |
| 41 | 4000 | 45.68 |
| 42 | 4100 | 43.91 |
| 43 | 4200 | 44.49 |
| 44 | 4300 | 45.73 |
| 45 | 4400 | 43.62 |
| 46 | 4500 | 43.86 |
| 47 | 4600 | 49.53 |
| 48 | 4700 | 50.33 |
| 49 | 4800 | 46.06 |
| 50 | 4900 | 44.48 |
Download This Route's Data
This route's measurement round is published as open data (CC BY 4.0) in CSV, JSON, and YAML. See About This Measurement for citation guidance.
Download this dataset
Per-route ICMP ping series, released under CC BY 4.0. Uncompressed plain text — no decompression step needed.
Theoretical Fiber Latency
The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Hong Kong (22.27832, 114.17469) and Tokyo (35.68950, 139.69171). It does not disclose either facility address.
| Physical Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| WGS-84 geodesic distance | 2,883.5 km |
| Vacuum RTT floor | 19.24 ms |
| Standard fiber RTT floor () | 28.24 ms |
| Low-latency fiber material floor | 28.12 ms |
| Engineering floor (5% path allowance) | 29.65 ms |
| Research 1.33× mapped-fiber reference | 37.56 ms |
| Estimated unamplified path loss | 605.5 dB |
| Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers | 38 / 37 |
| Published RTT inflation over fiber floor | 1.59× |
Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.
Stability & Trend
The current measurement round (2026-08-16T04:07:28Z) collected 50 ICMP echo samples on this route. Distribution statistics from that round:
| Round Statistic | Value |
|---|---|
| Minimum RTT | 42.32 ms |
| Average RTT | 44.9 ms |
| Maximum RTT | 50.91 ms |
| Standard deviation | 1.82 ms |
| Stdev / average | 4.1% |
RTT trend
Estimated route stability across the selected time window.
- Average
- 44.9 ms
- Minimum
- 44.4 ms
- Maximum
- 45.3 ms
- Average loss
- 0.02%
Route Context
- Departure PoP: Hong Kong (HKG)
- Destination PoP: Tokyo (TYO)
- Region overview: Asia Pacific → Asia Pacific
- Full global matrix: Backbone Latency Matrix
- Physical methodology: Theoretical Fiber Latency
Related City-Pair Routes
Reverse direction
- Tokyo to Hong Kong latency and RTT — 44.8 ms
Fastest routes departing Hong Kong (HKG)
- Hong Kong to Taipei latency and RTT — 14.7 ms
- Hong Kong to Singapore latency and RTT — 31.5 ms
- Hong Kong to Moscow latency and RTT — 118.2 ms
- Hong Kong to Seattle latency and RTT — 131.6 ms
- Hong Kong to Sydney latency and RTT — 137.2 ms
Fastest routes arriving at Tokyo (TYO)
- Taipei to Tokyo latency and RTT — 31.9 ms
- Singapore to Tokyo latency and RTT — 68.9 ms
- Seattle to Tokyo latency and RTT — 85 ms
- Los Angeles to Tokyo latency and RTT — 101.2 ms
- Sydney to Tokyo latency and RTT — 101.3 ms
Same corridor (Asia Pacific → Asia Pacific)
- Melbourne to Sydney latency and RTT — 9.8 ms
- Sydney to Melbourne latency and RTT — 9.8 ms
- Taipei to Hong Kong latency and RTT — 15.5 ms
About This Measurement
Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior measured with ICMP echo probes between PoPs. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. None of these values is an SLA.
The measurement round behind this page is published as open data under CC BY 4.0 in the Hats Network latency dataset. Per-pair files are available at /opendata/latency/latest/pairs/hkg-tyo.pings.{csv,json,yaml}. When citing, include the route, the measurement round timestamp, and the dataset version — for example: "Hats Network latency dataset, Hong Kong → Tokyo round 2026-08-16T04:07:28Z, CC BY 4.0".
Data auto-generated on August 16, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.