Hats Network | LogoHats Network
NetworkLatencyPairs

Tokyo to Miami Latency, Ping & RTT | AS203314

Tokyo to Miami ping and RTT: 156 ms, 1.57 ms jitter, 117.71 ms fiber floor, and 75.5% efficiency across AS203314. Updated 2026-07-19.

πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ This page compares the published ping and round-trip time (RTT) from Tokyo (TYO) to πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Miami (MIA) with vacuum and optical-fiber physical limits.

Latency Summary

MetricValue
RTT156 ms
Jitter1.57 ms
Packet Loss0%
Standard Fiber Floor117.71 ms
Fiber Efficiency75.5%
Latency TierFair
Source RegionAsia Pacific
Destination RegionNorth America

Theoretical Fiber Latency

The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Tokyo (35.68950, 139.69171) and Miami (25.77427, -80.19366). It does not disclose either facility address.

Physical ReferenceValue
WGS-84 geodesic distance12,019.9 km
Vacuum RTT floor80.19 ms
Standard fiber RTT floor (ng=1.4679n_g=1.4679)117.71 ms
Low-latency fiber material floor117.24 ms
Engineering floor (5% path allowance)123.61 ms
Research 1.33Γ— mapped-fiber reference156.55 ms
Estimated unamplified path loss2524.2 dB
Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers158 / 157
Published RTT inflation over fiber floor1.33Γ—

Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.

Stability & Trend

The following estimated indicators summarize route stability for the current publication period and are intended for comparative planning rather than SLA evaluation.

Stability IndicatorValue
Minimum RTT154.5 ms
Median RTT (p50)155.8 ms
95th percentile RTT (p95)158.1 ms
Maximum RTT160 ms
Jitter1.57 ms
Packet loss0%

RTT trend

Estimated route stability across the selected time window.

Average
156.2 ms
Minimum
154.5 ms
Maximum
157.5 ms
Average loss
0.03%

Route Context

About This Measurement

Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. Stability indicators are comparative estimates, and none of these values is an SLA.


Data auto-generated on July 19, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.

On this page