Hong Kong → New York, USA RTT
ICMP echo RTT measurement page for Hong Kong (Hong Kong) to New York (USA): 187.8 ms average, 0% loss, with latency stability context.
🇭🇰 Hong Kong (HKG) → 🇺🇸 New York, USA (NYC)
Measurement round: 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z.
During the 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z ICMP echo RTT session from Hong Kong to New York, the average latency was 187.8 ms, with a minimum of 179.48 ms and a maximum of 220.5 ms.
None of the 50 probes were lost, leaving packet loss at 0%. The measured average is 1.48 times the theoretical fiber floor of 127.11 ms for the 12,979.6 km geodesic route, corresponding to about 67.7% fiber efficiency.
Jitter reached 5.66 ms, and the standard deviation was 7.96 ms, indicating moderate dispersion around the mean. This route is ranked 16th among the 19 outbound paths from Hong Kong, and its variation relative to average latency is larger than the 3.08% network median, so zero packet loss coexists with meaningful RTT fluctuation on this East Coast path.
Latency Summary
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| RTT | 187.8 ms |
| Jitter | 5.66 ms |
| Packet Loss | 0% |
| Standard Fiber Floor | 127.11 ms |
| Fiber Efficiency | 67.7% |
| Latency Tier | Fair |
| Source Region | Asia Pacific |
| Destination Region | North America |
Ping Measurement Series
The chart below renders the 50-sample ICMP echo measurement round for this route; an accessible table of every sample is included with the chart.
Ping series: HKG → NYC
50 ICMP echo samples at 100 ms intervals · round 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z · avg 187.8 ± 1.13 ms (SE)
Sample distribution: box = interquartile range (182.4–191.2 ms), median 185.2 ms · whiskers = min–max · diamond = round average · each dot is one measured sample.
How to read this chart
The shaded band spans the measured minimum to maximum RTT of all samples collected up to that point, and the thin line traces the running average. The final position therefore matches the round statistics exactly — the band only widens when a new extreme sample arrives.
The dashed line is the round average, and the shaded band at the bottom is the theoretical fiber-optic floor (127.1 ms) for this route.
Full 50-sample dataset
| Seq | Offset (ms) | RTT (ms) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 206.69 |
| 2 | 100 | 191.39 |
| 3 | 200 | 185.53 |
| 4 | 300 | 181.39 |
| 5 | 400 | 189.88 |
| 6 | 500 | 183.04 |
| 7 | 600 | 189.01 |
| 8 | 700 | 182.90 |
| 9 | 800 | 182.38 |
| 10 | 900 | 183.54 |
| 11 | 1000 | 187.98 |
| 12 | 1100 | 183.92 |
| 13 | 1200 | 182.21 |
| 14 | 1300 | 186.03 |
| 15 | 1400 | 194.90 |
| 16 | 1500 | 187.02 |
| 17 | 1600 | 188.01 |
| 18 | 1700 | 192.72 |
| 19 | 1800 | 195.86 |
| 20 | 1900 | 190.35 |
| 21 | 2000 | 220.50 |
| 22 | 2100 | 195.63 |
| 23 | 2200 | 212.23 |
| 24 | 2300 | 193.43 |
| 25 | 2400 | 184.56 |
| 26 | 2500 | 181.23 |
| 27 | 2600 | 181.79 |
| 28 | 2700 | 180.97 |
| 29 | 2800 | 179.48 |
| 30 | 2900 | 180.07 |
| 31 | 3000 | 189.30 |
| 32 | 3100 | 191.70 |
| 33 | 3200 | 190.32 |
| 34 | 3300 | 184.86 |
| 35 | 3400 | 181.28 |
| 36 | 3500 | 180.66 |
| 37 | 3600 | 181.91 |
| 38 | 3700 | 182.44 |
| 39 | 3800 | 183.77 |
| 40 | 3900 | 182.82 |
| 41 | 4000 | 183.31 |
| 42 | 4100 | 191.45 |
| 43 | 4200 | 186.20 |
| 44 | 4300 | 182.07 |
| 45 | 4400 | 192.32 |
| 46 | 4500 | 190.45 |
| 47 | 4600 | 192.10 |
| 48 | 4700 | 183.44 |
| 49 | 4800 | 184.32 |
| 50 | 4900 | 180.64 |
Download This Route's Data
This route's measurement round is published as open data (CC BY 4.0) in CSV, JSON, and YAML. See About This Measurement for citation guidance.
Download this dataset
Per-route ICMP ping series, released under CC BY 4.0. Uncompressed plain text — no decompression step needed.
Theoretical Fiber Latency
The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Hong Kong (22.27832, 114.17469) and New York City (40.71427, -74.00597). It does not disclose either facility address.
| Physical Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| WGS-84 geodesic distance | 12,979.6 km |
| Vacuum RTT floor | 86.59 ms |
| Standard fiber RTT floor () | 127.11 ms |
| Low-latency fiber material floor | 126.6 ms |
| Engineering floor (5% path allowance) | 133.48 ms |
| Research 1.33× mapped-fiber reference | 169.05 ms |
| Estimated unamplified path loss | 2725.7 dB |
| Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers | 171 / 170 |
| Published RTT inflation over fiber floor | 1.48× |
Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.
Stability & Trend
The current measurement round (2026-08-15T04:03:13Z) collected 50 ICMP echo samples on this route. Distribution statistics from that round:
| Round Statistic | Value |
|---|---|
| Minimum RTT | 179.48 ms |
| Average RTT | 187.8 ms |
| Maximum RTT | 220.5 ms |
| Standard deviation | 7.96 ms |
| Stdev / average | 4.2% |
RTT trend
Estimated route stability across the selected time window.
- Average
- 188.0 ms
- Minimum
- 185.7 ms
- Maximum
- 189.4 ms
- Average loss
- 0.01%
Route Context
- Departure PoP: Hong Kong (HKG)
- Destination PoP: New York (NYC)
- Region overview: Asia Pacific → North America
- Full global matrix: Backbone Latency Matrix
- Physical methodology: Theoretical Fiber Latency
Related City-Pair Routes
Reverse direction
Fastest routes departing Hong Kong (HKG)
- Hong Kong to Taipei latency and RTT — 15.2 ms
- Hong Kong to Singapore latency and RTT — 31.2 ms
- Hong Kong to Tokyo latency and RTT — 45 ms
- Hong Kong to Moscow latency and RTT — 116.6 ms
- Hong Kong to Seattle latency and RTT — 129.9 ms
Fastest routes arriving at New York (NYC)
- Ashburn to New York latency and RTT — 6 ms
- Miami to New York latency and RTT — 34 ms
- Los Angeles to New York latency and RTT — 59 ms
- Seattle to New York latency and RTT — 59 ms
- London to New York latency and RTT — 63.5 ms
Same corridor (Asia Pacific → North America)
- Tokyo to Seattle latency and RTT — 84.6 ms
- Tokyo to Los Angeles latency and RTT — 101.5 ms
- Taipei to Seattle latency and RTT — 115.7 ms
About This Measurement
Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior measured with ICMP echo probes between PoPs. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. None of these values is an SLA.
The measurement round behind this page is published as open data under CC BY 4.0 in the Hats Network latency dataset. Per-pair files are available at /opendata/latency/latest/pairs/hkg-nyc.pings.{csv,json,yaml}. When citing, include the route, the measurement round timestamp, and the dataset version — for example: "Hats Network latency dataset, Hong Kong → New York round 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z, CC BY 4.0".
Data auto-generated on August 15, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.