Hats Network | LogoHats Network
NetworkLatencyPairs

Hong Kong to New York Latency, Ping & RTT | AS203314

Hong Kong to New York ping and RTT: 193.6 ms, 1.69 ms jitter, 127.11 ms fiber floor, and 65.7% efficiency across AS203314. Updated 2026-07-19.

πŸ‡­πŸ‡° This page compares the published ping and round-trip time (RTT) from Hong Kong (HKG) to πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ New York (NYC) with vacuum and optical-fiber physical limits.

Latency Summary

MetricValue
RTT193.6 ms
Jitter1.69 ms
Packet Loss0.17%
Standard Fiber Floor127.11 ms
Fiber Efficiency65.7%
Latency TierFair
Source RegionAsia Pacific
Destination RegionNorth America

Theoretical Fiber Latency

The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Hong Kong (22.27832, 114.17469) and New York City (40.71427, -74.00597). It does not disclose either facility address.

Physical ReferenceValue
WGS-84 geodesic distance12,979.6 km
Vacuum RTT floor86.59 ms
Standard fiber RTT floor (ng=1.4679n_g=1.4679)127.11 ms
Low-latency fiber material floor126.6 ms
Engineering floor (5% path allowance)133.48 ms
Research 1.33Γ— mapped-fiber reference169.05 ms
Estimated unamplified path loss2725.7 dB
Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers171 / 170
Published RTT inflation over fiber floor1.52Γ—

Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.

Stability & Trend

The following estimated indicators summarize route stability for the current publication period and are intended for comparative planning rather than SLA evaluation.

Stability IndicatorValue
Minimum RTT191.4 ms
Median RTT (p50)193.3 ms
95th percentile RTT (p95)196.3 ms
Maximum RTT196.7 ms
Jitter1.69 ms
Packet loss0.17%

RTT trend

Estimated route stability across the selected time window.

Average
193.8 ms
Minimum
191.5 ms
Maximum
195.6 ms
Average loss
0.01%

Route Context

About This Measurement

Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. Stability indicators are comparative estimates, and none of these values is an SLA.


Data auto-generated on July 19, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.

On this page