Hats Network | LogoHats Network
NetworkLatencyPairs

Hong Kong to Moscow Latency, Ping & RTT | AS203314

Hong Kong to Moscow ping and RTT: 119.6 ms, 1.14 ms jitter, 70.05 ms fiber floor, and 58.6% efficiency across AS203314. Updated 2026-07-19.

πŸ‡­πŸ‡° This page compares the published ping and round-trip time (RTT) from Hong Kong (HKG) to πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί Moscow (MOW) with vacuum and optical-fiber physical limits.

Latency Summary

MetricValue
RTT119.6 ms
Jitter1.14 ms
Packet Loss0.14%
Standard Fiber Floor70.05 ms
Fiber Efficiency58.6%
Latency TierGood
Source RegionAsia Pacific
Destination RegionEurope

Theoretical Fiber Latency

The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Hong Kong (22.27832, 114.17469) and Moscow (55.75204, 37.61781). It does not disclose either facility address.

Physical ReferenceValue
WGS-84 geodesic distance7,153.6 km
Vacuum RTT floor47.72 ms
Standard fiber RTT floor (ng=1.4679n_g=1.4679)70.05 ms
Low-latency fiber material floor69.77 ms
Engineering floor (5% path allowance)73.57 ms
Research 1.33Γ— mapped-fiber reference93.17 ms
Estimated unamplified path loss1502.3 dB
Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers94 / 93
Published RTT inflation over fiber floor1.71Γ—

Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.

Stability & Trend

The following estimated indicators summarize route stability for the current publication period and are intended for comparative planning rather than SLA evaluation.

Stability IndicatorValue
Minimum RTT118.5 ms
Median RTT (p50)119.5 ms
95th percentile RTT (p95)121.5 ms
Maximum RTT122.2 ms
Jitter1.14 ms
Packet loss0.14%

RTT trend

Estimated route stability across the selected time window.

Average
119.4 ms
Minimum
118.2 ms
Maximum
120.4 ms
Average loss
0.01%

Route Context

About This Measurement

Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. Stability indicators are comparative estimates, and none of these values is an SLA.


Data auto-generated on July 19, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.

On this page