New York to Hong Kong Latency, Ping & RTT | AS203314
New York to Hong Kong ping and RTT: 193.1 ms, 5.92 ms jitter, 127.11 ms fiber floor, and 65.8% efficiency across AS203314. Updated 2026-08-09.
πΊπΈ This page compares the published ping and round-trip time (RTT) from New York (NYC) to ππ° Hong Kong (HKG) with vacuum and optical-fiber physical limits.
As of August 9, 2026, the New York β Hong Kong route on Hats Network averages 193.1 ms RTT across a 50-sample daily ICMP echo measurement round (source: GSL), 1.52Γ the theoretical fiber-floor limit of 127.11 ms.
Among the 19 measured routes departing New York, this route ranks 15th fastest by average RTT.
With a stdev-to-average ratio of 2.9%, this route sits close to the network-wide stability median of 3.4%. Across the round, per-probe RTT ranged from 185.26 ms to 209.54 ms with a standard deviation of 5.63 ms.
Latency Summary
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| RTT | 193.1 ms |
| Jitter | 5.92 ms |
| Packet Loss | 0% |
| Standard Fiber Floor | 127.11 ms |
| Fiber Efficiency | 65.8% |
| Latency Tier | Fair |
| Source Region | North America |
| Destination Region | Asia Pacific |
Ping Measurement Series
The chart below renders the 50-sample ICMP echo measurement round for this route; an accessible table of every sample is included with the chart.
Ping series: NYC β HKG
50 ICMP echo samples at 100 ms intervals Β· round 2026-08-09 Β· avg 193.1 Β± 0.80 ms (SE)
Sample distribution: box = interquartile range (189.0β195.7 ms), median 192.2 ms Β· whiskers = minβmax Β· diamond = round average Β· each dot is one measured sample.
How to read this chart
The shaded band spans the measured minimum to maximum RTT of all samples collected up to that point, and the thin line traces the running average. The final position therefore matches the round statistics exactly β the band only widens when a new extreme sample arrives.
The dashed line is the round average, and the shaded band at the bottom is the theoretical fiber-optic floor (127.1 ms) for this route.
Full 50-sample dataset
| Seq | Offset (ms) | RTT (ms) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 185.26 |
| 2 | 100 | 185.62 |
| 3 | 200 | 189.00 |
| 4 | 300 | 194.73 |
| 5 | 400 | 191.81 |
| 6 | 500 | 188.33 |
| 7 | 600 | 196.14 |
| 8 | 700 | 189.00 |
| 9 | 800 | 186.77 |
| 10 | 900 | 186.09 |
| 11 | 1000 | 188.93 |
| 12 | 1100 | 206.87 |
| 13 | 1200 | 199.76 |
| 14 | 1300 | 191.26 |
| 15 | 1400 | 187.26 |
| 16 | 1500 | 189.30 |
| 17 | 1600 | 186.54 |
| 18 | 1700 | 192.06 |
| 19 | 1800 | 188.20 |
| 20 | 1900 | 193.25 |
| 21 | 2000 | 203.88 |
| 22 | 2100 | 192.57 |
| 23 | 2200 | 193.71 |
| 24 | 2300 | 202.27 |
| 25 | 2400 | 193.06 |
| 26 | 2500 | 196.74 |
| 27 | 2600 | 189.20 |
| 28 | 2700 | 209.54 |
| 29 | 2800 | 199.56 |
| 30 | 2900 | 195.16 |
| 31 | 3000 | 195.93 |
| 32 | 3100 | 189.29 |
| 33 | 3200 | 200.94 |
| 34 | 3300 | 192.35 |
| 35 | 3400 | 189.37 |
| 36 | 3500 | 186.38 |
| 37 | 3600 | 193.82 |
| 38 | 3700 | 202.26 |
| 39 | 3800 | 191.20 |
| 40 | 3900 | 190.01 |
| 41 | 4000 | 202.20 |
| 42 | 4100 | 192.28 |
| 43 | 4200 | 189.07 |
| 44 | 4300 | 187.54 |
| 45 | 4400 | 194.74 |
| 46 | 4500 | 191.11 |
| 47 | 4600 | 192.37 |
| 48 | 4700 | 193.87 |
| 49 | 4800 | 196.63 |
| 50 | 4900 | 191.77 |
Download This Route's Data
This route's measurement round is published as open data (CC BY 4.0) in CSV, JSON, and YAML. See About This Measurement for citation guidance.
Download this dataset
Per-route ICMP ping series, released under CC BY 4.0. Uncompressed plain text β no decompression step needed.
Theoretical Fiber Latency
The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for New York City (40.71427, -74.00597) and Hong Kong (22.27832, 114.17469). It does not disclose either facility address.
| Physical Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| WGS-84 geodesic distance | 12,979.6 km |
| Vacuum RTT floor | 86.59 ms |
| Standard fiber RTT floor () | 127.11 ms |
| Low-latency fiber material floor | 126.6 ms |
| Engineering floor (5% path allowance) | 133.48 ms |
| Research 1.33Γ mapped-fiber reference | 169.05 ms |
| Estimated unamplified path loss | 2725.7 dB |
| Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers | 171 / 170 |
| Published RTT inflation over fiber floor | 1.52Γ |
Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.
Stability & Trend
The current measurement round (2026-08-09) collected 50 ICMP echo samples on this route. Distribution statistics from that round:
| Round Statistic | Value |
|---|---|
| Minimum RTT | 185.26 ms |
| Average RTT | 193.1 ms |
| Maximum RTT | 209.54 ms |
| Standard deviation | 5.63 ms |
| Stdev / average | 2.9% |
RTT trend
Estimated route stability across the selected time window.
- Average
- 192.9 ms
- Minimum
- 191.2 ms
- Maximum
- 195.1 ms
- Average loss
- 0.02%
Route Context
- Departure PoP: New York (NYC)
- Destination PoP: Hong Kong (HKG)
- Region overview: North America β Asia Pacific
- Corridor overview: North America to Asia Pacific
- Full global matrix: Backbone Latency Matrix
- Physical methodology: Theoretical Fiber Latency
Related City-Pair Routes
Reverse direction
- Hong Kong to New York latency and RTT β 192.4 ms
Fastest routes departing New York (NYC)
- New York to Ashburn latency and RTT β 6.1 ms
- New York to Miami latency and RTT β 33.2 ms
- New York to Los Angeles latency and RTT β 58.9 ms
- New York to Seattle latency and RTT β 59.2 ms
- New York to London latency and RTT β 64.3 ms
Fastest routes arriving at Hong Kong (HKG)
- Taipei to Hong Kong latency and RTT β 14.7 ms
- Singapore to Hong Kong latency and RTT β 31.1 ms
- Tokyo to Hong Kong latency and RTT β 46.5 ms
- Moscow to Hong Kong latency and RTT β 122.1 ms
- Melbourne to Hong Kong latency and RTT β 126.1 ms
Same corridor (North America β Asia Pacific)
- Seattle to Tokyo latency and RTT β 84.6 ms
- Los Angeles to Tokyo latency and RTT β 100.8 ms
- Seattle to Taipei latency and RTT β 117.1 ms
About This Measurement
Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior measured with ICMP echo probes between PoPs. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. None of these values is an SLA.
The measurement round behind this page is published as open data under CC BY 4.0 in the Hats Network latency dataset. Per-pair files are available at /opendata/latency/latest/pairs/nyc-hkg.pings.{csv,json,yaml}. When citing, include the route, the measurement round date, and the dataset version β for example: "Hats Network latency dataset, New York β Hong Kong round 2026-08-09, CC BY 4.0".
Data auto-generated on August 9, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.