Hong Kong to Miami Latency, Ping & RTT | AS203314
Hong Kong to Miami ping and RTT: 201.4 ms, 8.81 ms jitter, 141.69 ms fiber floor, and 70.4% efficiency across AS203314. Updated 2026-08-09.
ππ° This page compares the published ping and round-trip time (RTT) from Hong Kong (HKG) to πΊπΈ Miami (MIA) with vacuum and optical-fiber physical limits.
As of August 9, 2026, the Hong Kong β Miami route on Hats Network averages 201.4 ms RTT across a 50-sample daily ICMP echo measurement round (source: GSL), 1.42Γ the theoretical fiber-floor limit of 141.69 ms.
Among the 19 measured routes departing Hong Kong, this route ranks 17th fastest by average RTT.
With a stdev-to-average ratio of 4.3%, this route fluctuates more than the network median of 3.4%, so short congestion windows can surface as transient RTT spikes. Across the round, per-probe RTT ranged from 191.27 ms to 228.43 ms with a standard deviation of 8.7 ms.
Latency Summary
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| RTT | 201.4 ms |
| Jitter | 8.81 ms |
| Packet Loss | 0% |
| Standard Fiber Floor | 141.69 ms |
| Fiber Efficiency | 70.4% |
| Latency Tier | Fair |
| Source Region | Asia Pacific |
| Destination Region | North America |
Ping Measurement Series
The chart below renders the 50-sample ICMP echo measurement round for this route; an accessible table of every sample is included with the chart.
Ping series: HKG β MIA
50 ICMP echo samples at 100 ms intervals Β· round 2026-08-09 Β· avg 201.4 Β± 1.23 ms (SE)
Sample distribution: box = interquartile range (195.2β205.2 ms), median 198.4 ms Β· whiskers = minβmax Β· diamond = round average Β· each dot is one measured sample.
How to read this chart
The shaded band spans the measured minimum to maximum RTT of all samples collected up to that point, and the thin line traces the running average. The final position therefore matches the round statistics exactly β the band only widens when a new extreme sample arrives.
The dashed line is the round average, and the shaded band at the bottom is the theoretical fiber-optic floor (141.7 ms) for this route.
Full 50-sample dataset
| Seq | Offset (ms) | RTT (ms) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 196.38 |
| 2 | 100 | 194.55 |
| 3 | 200 | 219.47 |
| 4 | 300 | 206.40 |
| 5 | 400 | 196.14 |
| 6 | 500 | 192.02 |
| 7 | 600 | 197.98 |
| 8 | 700 | 205.44 |
| 9 | 800 | 195.77 |
| 10 | 900 | 194.31 |
| 11 | 1000 | 208.63 |
| 12 | 1100 | 198.28 |
| 13 | 1200 | 194.92 |
| 14 | 1300 | 218.53 |
| 15 | 1400 | 200.66 |
| 16 | 1500 | 193.91 |
| 17 | 1600 | 191.27 |
| 18 | 1700 | 220.33 |
| 19 | 1800 | 203.81 |
| 20 | 1900 | 195.66 |
| 21 | 2000 | 203.46 |
| 22 | 2100 | 195.46 |
| 23 | 2200 | 195.21 |
| 24 | 2300 | 201.69 |
| 25 | 2400 | 201.28 |
| 26 | 2500 | 208.65 |
| 27 | 2600 | 205.98 |
| 28 | 2700 | 196.38 |
| 29 | 2800 | 194.81 |
| 30 | 2900 | 192.13 |
| 31 | 3000 | 195.36 |
| 32 | 3100 | 210.92 |
| 33 | 3200 | 204.37 |
| 34 | 3300 | 228.43 |
| 35 | 3400 | 212.16 |
| 36 | 3500 | 197.77 |
| 37 | 3600 | 199.82 |
| 38 | 3700 | 224.01 |
| 39 | 3800 | 201.48 |
| 40 | 3900 | 198.47 |
| 41 | 4000 | 195.09 |
| 42 | 4100 | 191.46 |
| 43 | 4200 | 195.18 |
| 44 | 4300 | 207.40 |
| 45 | 4400 | 200.72 |
| 46 | 4500 | 200.94 |
| 47 | 4600 | 202.30 |
| 48 | 4700 | 196.75 |
| 49 | 4800 | 195.94 |
| 50 | 4900 | 191.92 |
Download This Route's Data
This route's measurement round is published as open data (CC BY 4.0) in CSV, JSON, and YAML. See About This Measurement for citation guidance.
Download this dataset
Per-route ICMP ping series, released under CC BY 4.0. Uncompressed plain text β no decompression step needed.
Theoretical Fiber Latency
The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Hong Kong (22.27832, 114.17469) and Miami (25.77427, -80.19366). It does not disclose either facility address.
| Physical Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| WGS-84 geodesic distance | 14,468.4 km |
| Vacuum RTT floor | 96.52 ms |
| Standard fiber RTT floor () | 141.69 ms |
| Low-latency fiber material floor | 141.12 ms |
| Engineering floor (5% path allowance) | 148.79 ms |
| Research 1.33Γ mapped-fiber reference | 188.44 ms |
| Estimated unamplified path loss | 3038.4 dB |
| Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers | 190 / 189 |
| Published RTT inflation over fiber floor | 1.42Γ |
Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.
Stability & Trend
The current measurement round (2026-08-09) collected 50 ICMP echo samples on this route. Distribution statistics from that round:
| Round Statistic | Value |
|---|---|
| Minimum RTT | 191.27 ms |
| Average RTT | 201.4 ms |
| Maximum RTT | 228.43 ms |
| Standard deviation | 8.7 ms |
| Stdev / average | 4.3% |
RTT trend
Estimated route stability across the selected time window.
- Average
- 201.4 ms
- Minimum
- 199.2 ms
- Maximum
- 203.1 ms
- Average loss
- 0.02%
Route Context
- Departure PoP: Hong Kong (HKG)
- Destination PoP: Miami (MIA)
- Region overview: Asia Pacific β North America
- Full global matrix: Backbone Latency Matrix
- Physical methodology: Theoretical Fiber Latency
Related City-Pair Routes
Reverse direction
- Miami to Hong Kong latency and RTT β 199.3 ms
Fastest routes departing Hong Kong (HKG)
- Hong Kong to Taipei latency and RTT β 14.8 ms
- Hong Kong to Singapore latency and RTT β 31.6 ms
- Hong Kong to Tokyo latency and RTT β 44.9 ms
- Hong Kong to Moscow latency and RTT β 119.5 ms
- Hong Kong to Melbourne latency and RTT β 126.8 ms
Fastest routes arriving at Miami (MIA)
- Ashburn to Miami latency and RTT β 27.9 ms
- New York to Miami latency and RTT β 33.2 ms
- Los Angeles to Miami latency and RTT β 57.5 ms
- SΓ£o Paulo to Miami latency and RTT β 74 ms
- Seattle to Miami latency and RTT β 81.8 ms
Same corridor (Asia Pacific β North America)
- Tokyo to Seattle latency and RTT β 85.1 ms
- Tokyo to Los Angeles latency and RTT β 101.3 ms
- Taipei to Seattle latency and RTT β 117 ms
About This Measurement
Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior measured with ICMP echo probes between PoPs. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. None of these values is an SLA.
The measurement round behind this page is published as open data under CC BY 4.0 in the Hats Network latency dataset. Per-pair files are available at /opendata/latency/latest/pairs/hkg-mia.pings.{csv,json,yaml}. When citing, include the route, the measurement round date, and the dataset version β for example: "Hats Network latency dataset, Hong Kong β Miami round 2026-08-09, CC BY 4.0".
Data auto-generated on August 9, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.