Hats Network | LogoHats Network
NetworkLatencyPairs

Miami to Hong Kong Latency, Ping & RTT | AS203314

Miami to Hong Kong ping and RTT: 201.2 ms, 1.86 ms jitter, 141.69 ms fiber floor, and 70.4% efficiency across AS203314. Updated 2026-07-19.

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ This page compares the published ping and round-trip time (RTT) from Miami (MIA) to πŸ‡­πŸ‡° Hong Kong (HKG) with vacuum and optical-fiber physical limits.

Latency Summary

MetricValue
RTT201.2 ms
Jitter1.86 ms
Packet Loss0.07%
Standard Fiber Floor141.69 ms
Fiber Efficiency70.4%
Latency TierFair
Source RegionNorth America
Destination RegionAsia Pacific

Theoretical Fiber Latency

The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Miami (25.77427, -80.19366) and Hong Kong (22.27832, 114.17469). It does not disclose either facility address.

Physical ReferenceValue
WGS-84 geodesic distance14,468.4 km
Vacuum RTT floor96.52 ms
Standard fiber RTT floor (ng=1.4679n_g=1.4679)141.69 ms
Low-latency fiber material floor141.12 ms
Engineering floor (5% path allowance)148.79 ms
Research 1.33Γ— mapped-fiber reference188.44 ms
Estimated unamplified path loss3038.4 dB
Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers190 / 189
Published RTT inflation over fiber floor1.42Γ—

Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.

Stability & Trend

The following estimated indicators summarize route stability for the current publication period and are intended for comparative planning rather than SLA evaluation.

Stability IndicatorValue
Minimum RTT199.4 ms
Median RTT (p50)200.9 ms
95th percentile RTT (p95)203.8 ms
Maximum RTT204.8 ms
Jitter1.86 ms
Packet loss0.07%

RTT trend

Estimated route stability across the selected time window.

Average
201.1 ms
Minimum
199.1 ms
Maximum
202.9 ms
Average loss
0.02%

Route Context

About This Measurement

Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. Stability indicators are comparative estimates, and none of these values is an SLA.


Data auto-generated on July 19, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.

On this page