Hong Kong → London, UK RTT
ICMP RTT measurements between Hong Kong, Hong Kong and London, UK: average, minimum and maximum latency, jitter, packet loss and route stability.
🇭🇰 Hong Kong (HKG) → 🇬🇧 London, UK (LON)
Measurement round: 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z.
In the 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z round, 50 ICMP echo probes from Hong Kong to London averaged 158.3 ms, with a minimum of 152.79 ms, a maximum of 175.92 ms, and zero packet loss. Jitter of 3.85 ms and a standard deviation of 4.89 ms indicate a consistent path over the 9,644 km route.
At 1.68 times the theoretical fiber-floor RTT for the distance, the route works out to 59.7% fiber efficiency. The roughly 64 ms gap between measured RTT and the floor is expected because the floor assumes a straight-line fiber ideal rather than the actual cable infrastructure.
This route is ranked 12th among the 19 outbound routes in the same round, placing it just beyond the midpoint. Its relative variability is about 3.1% of average RTT, closely matching the 3.08% median across the route set; with no loss, London traffic can be treated as a stable near-158 ms baseline in this round.
Latency Summary
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| RTT | 158.3 ms |
| Jitter | 3.85 ms |
| Packet Loss | 0% |
| Standard Fiber Floor | 94.44 ms |
| Fiber Efficiency | 59.7% |
| Latency Tier | Fair |
| Source Region | Asia Pacific |
| Destination Region | Europe |
Ping Measurement Series
The chart below renders the 50-sample ICMP echo measurement round for this route; an accessible table of every sample is included with the chart.
Ping series: HKG → LON
50 ICMP echo samples at 100 ms intervals · round 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z · avg 158.3 ± 0.69 ms (SE)
Sample distribution: box = interquartile range (155.3–160.1 ms), median 156.8 ms · whiskers = min–max · diamond = round average · each dot is one measured sample.
How to read this chart
The shaded band spans the measured minimum to maximum RTT of all samples collected up to that point, and the thin line traces the running average. The final position therefore matches the round statistics exactly — the band only widens when a new extreme sample arrives.
The dashed line is the round average, and the shaded band at the bottom is the theoretical fiber-optic floor (94.4 ms) for this route.
Full 50-sample dataset
| Seq | Offset (ms) | RTT (ms) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 152.79 |
| 2 | 100 | 156.58 |
| 3 | 200 | 157.21 |
| 4 | 300 | 158.06 |
| 5 | 400 | 154.71 |
| 6 | 500 | 153.94 |
| 7 | 600 | 153.97 |
| 8 | 700 | 155.60 |
| 9 | 800 | 162.31 |
| 10 | 900 | 175.92 |
| 11 | 1000 | 163.03 |
| 12 | 1100 | 156.32 |
| 13 | 1200 | 161.40 |
| 14 | 1300 | 155.95 |
| 15 | 1400 | 155.30 |
| 16 | 1500 | 153.64 |
| 17 | 1600 | 162.61 |
| 18 | 1700 | 156.85 |
| 19 | 1800 | 156.29 |
| 20 | 1900 | 154.68 |
| 21 | 2000 | 153.81 |
| 22 | 2100 | 153.76 |
| 23 | 2200 | 171.81 |
| 24 | 2300 | 166.08 |
| 25 | 2400 | 163.74 |
| 26 | 2500 | 156.73 |
| 27 | 2600 | 170.61 |
| 28 | 2700 | 160.65 |
| 29 | 2800 | 156.90 |
| 30 | 2900 | 156.62 |
| 31 | 3000 | 160.38 |
| 32 | 3100 | 157.29 |
| 33 | 3200 | 158.82 |
| 34 | 3300 | 157.99 |
| 35 | 3400 | 156.70 |
| 36 | 3500 | 165.42 |
| 37 | 3600 | 162.72 |
| 38 | 3700 | 157.92 |
| 39 | 3800 | 156.27 |
| 40 | 3900 | 157.89 |
| 41 | 4000 | 155.45 |
| 42 | 4100 | 153.94 |
| 43 | 4200 | 153.85 |
| 44 | 4300 | 153.85 |
| 45 | 4400 | 155.59 |
| 46 | 4500 | 157.71 |
| 47 | 4600 | 157.06 |
| 48 | 4700 | 159.18 |
| 49 | 4800 | 155.27 |
| 50 | 4900 | 153.83 |
Download This Route's Data
This route's measurement round is published as open data (CC BY 4.0) in CSV, JSON, and YAML. See About This Measurement for citation guidance.
Download this dataset
Per-route ICMP ping series, released under CC BY 4.0. Uncompressed plain text — no decompression step needed.
Theoretical Fiber Latency
The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Hong Kong (22.27832, 114.17469) and London (51.50853, -0.12574). It does not disclose either facility address.
| Physical Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| WGS-84 geodesic distance | 9,643.6 km |
| Vacuum RTT floor | 64.34 ms |
| Standard fiber RTT floor () | 94.44 ms |
| Low-latency fiber material floor | 94.06 ms |
| Engineering floor (5% path allowance) | 99.17 ms |
| Research 1.33× mapped-fiber reference | 125.6 ms |
| Estimated unamplified path loss | 2025.2 dB |
| Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers | 127 / 126 |
| Published RTT inflation over fiber floor | 1.68× |
Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.
Stability & Trend
The current measurement round (2026-08-15T04:03:13Z) collected 50 ICMP echo samples on this route. Distribution statistics from that round:
| Round Statistic | Value |
|---|---|
| Minimum RTT | 152.79 ms |
| Average RTT | 158.3 ms |
| Maximum RTT | 175.92 ms |
| Standard deviation | 4.89 ms |
| Stdev / average | 3.1% |
RTT trend
Estimated route stability across the selected time window.
- Average
- 158.3 ms
- Minimum
- 156.8 ms
- Maximum
- 159.8 ms
- Average loss
- 0.04%
Route Context
- Departure PoP: Hong Kong (HKG)
- Destination PoP: London (LON)
- Region overview: Asia Pacific → Europe
- Full global matrix: Backbone Latency Matrix
- Physical methodology: Theoretical Fiber Latency
Related City-Pair Routes
Reverse direction
- London to Hong Kong latency and RTT — 160.5 ms
Fastest routes departing Hong Kong (HKG)
- Hong Kong to Taipei latency and RTT — 15.2 ms
- Hong Kong to Singapore latency and RTT — 31.2 ms
- Hong Kong to Tokyo latency and RTT — 45 ms
- Hong Kong to Moscow latency and RTT — 116.6 ms
- Hong Kong to Seattle latency and RTT — 129.9 ms
Fastest routes arriving at London (LON)
- Amsterdam to London latency and RTT — 5.1 ms
- Paris to London latency and RTT — 7.1 ms
- Frankfurt to London latency and RTT — 12.6 ms
- Berlin to London latency and RTT — 15.9 ms
- Marseille to London latency and RTT — 24.5 ms
Same corridor (Asia Pacific → Europe)
- Taipei to Moscow latency and RTT — 131.7 ms
- Singapore to Marseille latency and RTT — 138.8 ms
- Hong Kong to Berlin latency and RTT — 143.6 ms
About This Measurement
Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior measured with ICMP echo probes between PoPs. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. None of these values is an SLA.
The measurement round behind this page is published as open data under CC BY 4.0 in the Hats Network latency dataset. Per-pair files are available at /opendata/latency/latest/pairs/hkg-lon.pings.{csv,json,yaml}. When citing, include the route, the measurement round timestamp, and the dataset version — for example: "Hats Network latency dataset, Hong Kong → London round 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z, CC BY 4.0".
Data auto-generated on August 15, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.