London, UK → Hong Kong RTT
ICMP echo RTT data for London, UK to Hong Kong: average, minimum and maximum latency, jitter, standard deviation, and packet loss.
🇬🇧 London, UK (LON) → 🇭🇰 Hong Kong (HKG)
Measurement round: 2026-08-16T04:07:28Z.
In the 2026-08-16T04:07:28Z round, 50 ICMP echo requests from London to Hong Kong averaged 160.6 ms, with the fastest sample at 151.57 ms and the slowest at 189.08 ms. Packet loss was 0% and jitter was 6.03 ms.
The great-circle distance of 9,643.6 km implies a fiber-floor estimate near 94.4 ms, so the observed mean is about 1.7 times that lower bound. The route ranks 13th among the 19 London-origin departures tracked in this round.
Sample spread was moderate: the 7.9 ms standard deviation translates to about 4.9% of the average, slightly above the 3.3% typical for the round's London departure set. With zero loss and a min-to-max range of 37.5 ms, London-to-Hong Kong is stable enough to be a useful reference for long-haul Asia-Pacific latency.
Latency Summary
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| RTT | 160.6 ms |
| Jitter | 6.03 ms |
| Packet Loss | 0% |
| Standard Fiber Floor | 94.44 ms |
| Fiber Efficiency | 58.8% |
| Latency Tier | Fair |
| Source Region | Europe |
| Destination Region | Asia Pacific |
Ping Measurement Series
The chart below renders the 50-sample ICMP echo measurement round for this route; an accessible table of every sample is included with the chart.
Ping series: LON → HKG
50 ICMP echo samples at 100 ms intervals · round 2026-08-16T04:07:28Z · avg 160.6 ± 1.12 ms (SE)
Sample distribution: box = interquartile range (154.2–163.8 ms), median 159.8 ms · whiskers = min–max · diamond = round average · each dot is one measured sample.
How to read this chart
The shaded band spans the measured minimum to maximum RTT of all samples collected up to that point, and the thin line traces the running average. The final position therefore matches the round statistics exactly — the band only widens when a new extreme sample arrives.
The dashed line is the round average, and the shaded band at the bottom is the theoretical fiber-optic floor (94.4 ms) for this route.
Full 50-sample dataset
| Seq | Offset (ms) | RTT (ms) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 155.97 |
| 2 | 100 | 153.70 |
| 3 | 200 | 152.87 |
| 4 | 300 | 168.45 |
| 5 | 400 | 157.81 |
| 6 | 500 | 154.86 |
| 7 | 600 | 161.52 |
| 8 | 700 | 154.79 |
| 9 | 800 | 179.43 |
| 10 | 900 | 169.04 |
| 11 | 1000 | 163.22 |
| 12 | 1100 | 163.49 |
| 13 | 1200 | 163.27 |
| 14 | 1300 | 161.77 |
| 15 | 1400 | 168.98 |
| 16 | 1500 | 162.53 |
| 17 | 1600 | 156.23 |
| 18 | 1700 | 153.80 |
| 19 | 1800 | 152.07 |
| 20 | 1900 | 152.08 |
| 21 | 2000 | 151.57 |
| 22 | 2100 | 151.88 |
| 23 | 2200 | 152.96 |
| 24 | 2300 | 161.53 |
| 25 | 2400 | 160.59 |
| 26 | 2500 | 159.05 |
| 27 | 2600 | 167.09 |
| 28 | 2700 | 166.12 |
| 29 | 2800 | 156.47 |
| 30 | 2900 | 154.14 |
| 31 | 3000 | 155.49 |
| 32 | 3100 | 154.01 |
| 33 | 3200 | 152.41 |
| 34 | 3300 | 151.65 |
| 35 | 3400 | 153.66 |
| 36 | 3500 | 175.05 |
| 37 | 3600 | 163.97 |
| 38 | 3700 | 164.66 |
| 39 | 3800 | 160.64 |
| 40 | 3900 | 155.44 |
| 41 | 4000 | 156.70 |
| 42 | 4100 | 167.97 |
| 43 | 4200 | 161.29 |
| 44 | 4300 | 156.22 |
| 45 | 4400 | 154.36 |
| 46 | 4500 | 162.69 |
| 47 | 4600 | 189.08 |
| 48 | 4700 | 168.93 |
| 49 | 4800 | 162.98 |
| 50 | 4900 | 175.52 |
Download This Route's Data
This route's measurement round is published as open data (CC BY 4.0) in CSV, JSON, and YAML. See About This Measurement for citation guidance.
Download this dataset
Per-route ICMP ping series, released under CC BY 4.0. Uncompressed plain text — no decompression step needed.
Theoretical Fiber Latency
The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for London (51.50853, -0.12574) and Hong Kong (22.27832, 114.17469). It does not disclose either facility address.
| Physical Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| WGS-84 geodesic distance | 9,643.6 km |
| Vacuum RTT floor | 64.34 ms |
| Standard fiber RTT floor () | 94.44 ms |
| Low-latency fiber material floor | 94.06 ms |
| Engineering floor (5% path allowance) | 99.17 ms |
| Research 1.33× mapped-fiber reference | 125.6 ms |
| Estimated unamplified path loss | 2025.2 dB |
| Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers | 127 / 126 |
| Published RTT inflation over fiber floor | 1.7× |
Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.
Stability & Trend
The current measurement round (2026-08-16T04:07:28Z) collected 50 ICMP echo samples on this route. Distribution statistics from that round:
| Round Statistic | Value |
|---|---|
| Minimum RTT | 151.57 ms |
| Average RTT | 160.6 ms |
| Maximum RTT | 189.08 ms |
| Standard deviation | 7.9 ms |
| Stdev / average | 4.9% |
RTT trend
Estimated route stability across the selected time window.
- Average
- 160.3 ms
- Minimum
- 158.9 ms
- Maximum
- 162.2 ms
- Average loss
- 0.01%
Route Context
- Departure PoP: London (LON)
- Destination PoP: Hong Kong (HKG)
- Region overview: Europe → Asia Pacific
- Corridor overview: Europe to Asia Pacific
- Full global matrix: Backbone Latency Matrix
- Physical methodology: Theoretical Fiber Latency
Related City-Pair Routes
Reverse direction
- Hong Kong to London latency and RTT — 158.7 ms
Fastest routes departing London (LON)
- London to Amsterdam latency and RTT — 5.2 ms
- London to Paris latency and RTT — 6.4 ms
- London to Frankfurt latency and RTT — 13.6 ms
- London to Berlin latency and RTT — 16.2 ms
- London to Marseille latency and RTT — 17.9 ms
Fastest routes arriving at Hong Kong (HKG)
- Taipei to Hong Kong latency and RTT — 15.5 ms
- Singapore to Hong Kong latency and RTT — 30.8 ms
- Tokyo to Hong Kong latency and RTT — 44.8 ms
- Moscow to Hong Kong latency and RTT — 118.6 ms
- Seattle to Hong Kong latency and RTT — 130.4 ms
Same corridor (Europe → Asia Pacific)
- Moscow to Taipei latency and RTT — 132.1 ms
- Marseille to Singapore latency and RTT — 139.6 ms
- Berlin to Hong Kong latency and RTT — 144.9 ms
About This Measurement
Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior measured with ICMP echo probes between PoPs. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. None of these values is an SLA.
The measurement round behind this page is published as open data under CC BY 4.0 in the Hats Network latency dataset. Per-pair files are available at /opendata/latency/latest/pairs/lon-hkg.pings.{csv,json,yaml}. When citing, include the route, the measurement round timestamp, and the dataset version — for example: "Hats Network latency dataset, London → Hong Kong round 2026-08-16T04:07:28Z, CC BY 4.0".
Data auto-generated on August 16, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.