Hats Network | LogoHats Network
NetworkLatencyPairs

London to Hong Kong Latency, Ping & RTT | AS203314

London to Hong Kong ping and RTT: 161 ms, 1.86 ms jitter, 94.44 ms fiber floor, and 58.7% efficiency across AS203314. Updated 2026-07-19.

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ This page compares the published ping and round-trip time (RTT) from London (LON) to πŸ‡­πŸ‡° Hong Kong (HKG) with vacuum and optical-fiber physical limits.

Latency Summary

MetricValue
RTT161 ms
Jitter1.86 ms
Packet Loss0.13%
Standard Fiber Floor94.44 ms
Fiber Efficiency58.7%
Latency TierFair
Source RegionEurope
Destination RegionAsia Pacific

Theoretical Fiber Latency

The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for London (51.50853, -0.12574) and Hong Kong (22.27832, 114.17469). It does not disclose either facility address.

Physical ReferenceValue
WGS-84 geodesic distance9,643.6 km
Vacuum RTT floor64.34 ms
Standard fiber RTT floor (ng=1.4679n_g=1.4679)94.44 ms
Low-latency fiber material floor94.06 ms
Engineering floor (5% path allowance)99.17 ms
Research 1.33Γ— mapped-fiber reference125.6 ms
Estimated unamplified path loss2025.2 dB
Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers127 / 126
Published RTT inflation over fiber floor1.7Γ—

Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.

Stability & Trend

The following estimated indicators summarize route stability for the current publication period and are intended for comparative planning rather than SLA evaluation.

Stability IndicatorValue
Minimum RTT159 ms
Median RTT (p50)160.8 ms
95th percentile RTT (p95)163.9 ms
Maximum RTT164.6 ms
Jitter1.86 ms
Packet loss0.13%

RTT trend

Estimated route stability across the selected time window.

Average
161.1 ms
Minimum
160.0 ms
Maximum
162.6 ms
Average loss
0.01%

Route Context

About This Measurement

Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. Stability indicators are comparative estimates, and none of these values is an SLA.


Data auto-generated on July 19, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.

On this page