Hats Network | LogoHats Network
NetworkLatencyPairs

New York to São Paulo Latency, Ping & RTT | AS203314

New York to São Paulo ping and RTT: 113.4 ms, 1.05 ms jitter, 74.99 ms fiber floor, and 66.1% efficiency across AS203314. Updated 2026-07-19.

🇺🇸 This page compares the published ping and round-trip time (RTT) from New York (NYC) to 🇧🇷 São Paulo (GRU) with vacuum and optical-fiber physical limits.

Latency Summary

MetricValue
RTT113.4 ms
Jitter1.05 ms
Packet Loss0%
Standard Fiber Floor74.99 ms
Fiber Efficiency66.1%
Latency TierGood
Source RegionNorth America
Destination RegionSouth America

Theoretical Fiber Latency

The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for New York City (40.71427, -74.00597) and São Paulo (-23.54750, -46.63611). It does not disclose either facility address.

Physical ReferenceValue
WGS-84 geodesic distance7,657.6 km
Vacuum RTT floor51.09 ms
Standard fiber RTT floor (ng=1.4679n_g=1.4679)74.99 ms
Low-latency fiber material floor74.69 ms
Engineering floor (5% path allowance)78.75 ms
Research 1.33× mapped-fiber reference99.74 ms
Estimated unamplified path loss1608.1 dB
Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers101 / 100
Published RTT inflation over fiber floor1.51×

Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.

Stability & Trend

The following estimated indicators summarize route stability for the current publication period and are intended for comparative planning rather than SLA evaluation.

Stability IndicatorValue
Minimum RTT112.2 ms
Median RTT (p50)113.2 ms
95th percentile RTT (p95)114.9 ms
Maximum RTT115.6 ms
Jitter1.05 ms
Packet loss0%

RTT trend

Estimated route stability across the selected time window.

Average
113.5 ms
Minimum
112.4 ms
Maximum
114.7 ms
Average loss
0.02%

Route Context

About This Measurement

Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. Stability indicators are comparative estimates, and none of these values is an SLA.


Data auto-generated on July 19, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.

On this page