Frankfurt to Tokyo Latency, Ping & RTT | AS203314
Frankfurt to Tokyo ping and RTT: 195.5 ms, 10.2 ms jitter, 91.61 ms fiber floor, and 46.9% efficiency across AS203314. Updated 2026-08-09.
π©πͺ This page compares the published ping and round-trip time (RTT) from Frankfurt (FRA) to π―π΅ Tokyo (TYO) with vacuum and optical-fiber physical limits.
As of August 9, 2026, the Frankfurt β Tokyo route on Hats Network averages 195.5 ms RTT across a 50-sample daily ICMP echo measurement round (source: RETN), 2.13Γ the theoretical fiber-floor limit of 91.61 ms.
Among the 19 measured routes departing Frankfurt, this route ranks 17th fastest by average RTT.
With a stdev-to-average ratio of 4.7%, this route fluctuates more than the network median of 3.4%, so short congestion windows can surface as transient RTT spikes. Across the round, per-probe RTT ranged from 183.65 ms to 221.99 ms with a standard deviation of 9.27 ms.
Latency Summary
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| RTT | 195.5 ms |
| Jitter | 10.2 ms |
| Packet Loss | 0% |
| Standard Fiber Floor | 91.61 ms |
| Fiber Efficiency | 46.9% |
| Latency Tier | Fair |
| Source Region | Europe |
| Destination Region | Asia Pacific |
Ping Measurement Series
The chart below renders the 50-sample ICMP echo measurement round for this route; an accessible table of every sample is included with the chart.
Ping series: FRA β TYO
50 ICMP echo samples at 100 ms intervals Β· round 2026-08-09 Β· avg 195.5 Β± 1.31 ms (SE)
Sample distribution: box = interquartile range (188.7β199.3 ms), median 192.6 ms Β· whiskers = minβmax Β· diamond = round average Β· each dot is one measured sample.
How to read this chart
The shaded band spans the measured minimum to maximum RTT of all samples collected up to that point, and the thin line traces the running average. The final position therefore matches the round statistics exactly β the band only widens when a new extreme sample arrives.
The dashed line is the round average, and the shaded band at the bottom is the theoretical fiber-optic floor (91.6 ms) for this route.
Full 50-sample dataset
| Seq | Offset (ms) | RTT (ms) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 183.65 |
| 2 | 100 | 212.83 |
| 3 | 200 | 195.93 |
| 4 | 300 | 191.60 |
| 5 | 400 | 192.41 |
| 6 | 500 | 186.73 |
| 7 | 600 | 214.03 |
| 8 | 700 | 200.80 |
| 9 | 800 | 188.42 |
| 10 | 900 | 202.76 |
| 11 | 1000 | 191.41 |
| 12 | 1100 | 193.09 |
| 13 | 1200 | 188.74 |
| 14 | 1300 | 190.09 |
| 15 | 1400 | 194.18 |
| 16 | 1500 | 186.14 |
| 17 | 1600 | 197.05 |
| 18 | 1700 | 205.03 |
| 19 | 1800 | 192.15 |
| 20 | 1900 | 185.41 |
| 21 | 2000 | 201.27 |
| 22 | 2100 | 216.79 |
| 23 | 2200 | 195.49 |
| 24 | 2300 | 188.73 |
| 25 | 2400 | 189.40 |
| 26 | 2500 | 186.32 |
| 27 | 2600 | 184.88 |
| 28 | 2700 | 188.79 |
| 29 | 2800 | 201.46 |
| 30 | 2900 | 196.29 |
| 31 | 3000 | 195.70 |
| 32 | 3100 | 186.66 |
| 33 | 3200 | 206.73 |
| 34 | 3300 | 192.24 |
| 35 | 3400 | 189.95 |
| 36 | 3500 | 185.55 |
| 37 | 3600 | 203.92 |
| 38 | 3700 | 199.70 |
| 39 | 3800 | 191.87 |
| 40 | 3900 | 188.71 |
| 41 | 4000 | 197.31 |
| 42 | 4100 | 221.99 |
| 43 | 4200 | 197.44 |
| 44 | 4300 | 188.35 |
| 45 | 4400 | 187.15 |
| 46 | 4500 | 221.49 |
| 47 | 4600 | 197.20 |
| 48 | 4700 | 198.10 |
| 49 | 4800 | 192.81 |
| 50 | 4900 | 190.26 |
Download This Route's Data
This route's measurement round is published as open data (CC BY 4.0) in CSV, JSON, and YAML. See About This Measurement for citation guidance.
Download this dataset
Per-route ICMP ping series, released under CC BY 4.0. Uncompressed plain text β no decompression step needed.
Theoretical Fiber Latency
The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Frankfurt am Main (50.11552, 8.68417) and Tokyo (35.68950, 139.69171). It does not disclose either facility address.
| Physical Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| WGS-84 geodesic distance | 9,354.4 km |
| Vacuum RTT floor | 62.41 ms |
| Standard fiber RTT floor () | 91.61 ms |
| Low-latency fiber material floor | 91.24 ms |
| Engineering floor (5% path allowance) | 96.2 ms |
| Research 1.33Γ mapped-fiber reference | 121.84 ms |
| Estimated unamplified path loss | 1964.4 dB |
| Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers | 123 / 122 |
| Published RTT inflation over fiber floor | 2.13Γ |
Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.
Stability & Trend
The current measurement round (2026-08-09) collected 50 ICMP echo samples on this route. Distribution statistics from that round:
| Round Statistic | Value |
|---|---|
| Minimum RTT | 183.65 ms |
| Average RTT | 195.5 ms |
| Maximum RTT | 221.99 ms |
| Standard deviation | 9.27 ms |
| Stdev / average | 4.7% |
RTT trend
Estimated route stability across the selected time window.
- Average
- 195.4 ms
- Minimum
- 193.3 ms
- Maximum
- 197.6 ms
- Average loss
- 0.02%
Route Context
- Departure PoP: Frankfurt (FRA)
- Destination PoP: Tokyo (TYO)
- Region overview: Europe β Asia Pacific
- Corridor overview: Europe to Asia Pacific
- Full global matrix: Backbone Latency Matrix
- Physical methodology: Theoretical Fiber Latency
Related City-Pair Routes
Reverse direction
- Tokyo to Frankfurt latency and RTT β 196.1 ms
Fastest routes departing Frankfurt (FRA)
- Frankfurt to Amsterdam latency and RTT β 5.9 ms
- Frankfurt to Berlin latency and RTT β 6.1 ms
- Frankfurt to Paris latency and RTT β 7.6 ms
- Frankfurt to London latency and RTT β 13.2 ms
- Frankfurt to Marseille latency and RTT β 16.5 ms
Fastest routes arriving at Tokyo (TYO)
- Taipei to Tokyo latency and RTT β 31.2 ms
- Hong Kong to Tokyo latency and RTT β 44.9 ms
- Singapore to Tokyo latency and RTT β 69.8 ms
- Seattle to Tokyo latency and RTT β 84.6 ms
- Los Angeles to Tokyo latency and RTT β 100.8 ms
Same corridor (Europe β Asia Pacific)
- Moscow to Hong Kong latency and RTT β 122.1 ms
- Moscow to Taipei latency and RTT β 133.1 ms
- Marseille to Singapore latency and RTT β 137.3 ms
About This Measurement
Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior measured with ICMP echo probes between PoPs. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. None of these values is an SLA.
The measurement round behind this page is published as open data under CC BY 4.0 in the Hats Network latency dataset. Per-pair files are available at /opendata/latency/latest/pairs/fra-tyo.pings.{csv,json,yaml}. When citing, include the route, the measurement round date, and the dataset version β for example: "Hats Network latency dataset, Frankfurt β Tokyo round 2026-08-09, CC BY 4.0".
Data auto-generated on August 9, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.