Hats Network | LogoHats Network
NetworkLatencyPairs

Seattle to Moscow Latency, Ping & RTT | AS203314

Seattle to Moscow ping and RTT: 164.1 ms, 1.62 ms jitter, 82.23 ms fiber floor, and 50.1% efficiency across AS203314. Updated 2026-07-19.

🇺🇸 This page compares the published ping and round-trip time (RTT) from Seattle (SEA) to 🇷🇺 Moscow (MOW) with vacuum and optical-fiber physical limits.

Latency Summary

MetricValue
RTT164.1 ms
Jitter1.62 ms
Packet Loss0%
Standard Fiber Floor82.23 ms
Fiber Efficiency50.1%
Latency TierFair
Source RegionNorth America
Destination RegionEurope

Theoretical Fiber Latency

The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Seattle (47.60621, -122.33207) and Moscow (55.75204, 37.61781). It does not disclose either facility address.

Physical ReferenceValue
WGS-84 geodesic distance8,396.9 km
Vacuum RTT floor56.02 ms
Standard fiber RTT floor (ng=1.4679n_g=1.4679)82.23 ms
Low-latency fiber material floor81.9 ms
Engineering floor (5% path allowance)86.35 ms
Research 1.33× mapped-fiber reference109.36 ms
Estimated unamplified path loss1763.3 dB
Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers111 / 110
Published RTT inflation over fiber floor2×

Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.

Stability & Trend

The following estimated indicators summarize route stability for the current publication period and are intended for comparative planning rather than SLA evaluation.

Stability IndicatorValue
Minimum RTT162.5 ms
Median RTT (p50)163.8 ms
95th percentile RTT (p95)166.2 ms
Maximum RTT168.2 ms
Jitter1.62 ms
Packet loss0%

RTT trend

Estimated route stability across the selected time window.

Average
163.9 ms
Minimum
162.9 ms
Maximum
165.7 ms
Average loss
0.03%

Route Context

About This Measurement

Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. Stability indicators are comparative estimates, and none of these values is an SLA.


Data auto-generated on July 19, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.

On this page