Moscow, Russia → Seattle, USA RTT
ICMP echo RTT measurements from Moscow, Russia to Seattle, USA: average latency, jitter, packet loss and route efficiency for this trans-Pacific link.
🇷🇺 Moscow, Russia (MOW) → 🇺🇸 Seattle, USA (SEA)
Measurement round: 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z.
During the 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z measurement round, the 50 ICMP echo samples from Moscow to Seattle averaged 165.2 ms RTT, with a minimum of 158.26 ms and a maximum of 182.68 ms. No packets were lost.
That average is roughly 2.01 times the theoretical fiber-floor transit time over the 8,396.9 km great-circle distance, so the route realizes about 49.8% direct-line fiber efficiency. The 5.33 ms standard deviation and 5.69 ms jitter indicate a consistent path, and the Fair latency tier reflects the high absolute RTT.
This route ranked 14th among the 19 outbound paths from Moscow in this round, placing it in the slower half of the set. Its relative variability of about 3.2% is close to the network's median relative variability of 3.08%, so the main limitation is total transit time rather than stability.
Latency Summary
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| RTT | 165.2 ms |
| Jitter | 5.69 ms |
| Packet Loss | 0% |
| Standard Fiber Floor | 82.23 ms |
| Fiber Efficiency | 49.8% |
| Latency Tier | Fair |
| Source Region | Europe |
| Destination Region | North America |
Ping Measurement Series
The chart below renders the 50-sample ICMP echo measurement round for this route; an accessible table of every sample is included with the chart.
Ping series: MOW → SEA
50 ICMP echo samples at 100 ms intervals · round 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z · avg 165.2 ± 0.75 ms (SE)
Sample distribution: box = interquartile range (161.4–168.4 ms), median 164.1 ms · whiskers = min–max · diamond = round average · each dot is one measured sample.
How to read this chart
The shaded band spans the measured minimum to maximum RTT of all samples collected up to that point, and the thin line traces the running average. The final position therefore matches the round statistics exactly — the band only widens when a new extreme sample arrives.
The dashed line is the round average, and the shaded band at the bottom is the theoretical fiber-optic floor (82.2 ms) for this route.
Full 50-sample dataset
| Seq | Offset (ms) | RTT (ms) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 158.26 |
| 2 | 100 | 160.65 |
| 3 | 200 | 158.64 |
| 4 | 300 | 166.68 |
| 5 | 400 | 161.41 |
| 6 | 500 | 165.75 |
| 7 | 600 | 161.44 |
| 8 | 700 | 160.74 |
| 9 | 800 | 158.72 |
| 10 | 900 | 177.62 |
| 11 | 1000 | 169.54 |
| 12 | 1100 | 161.61 |
| 13 | 1200 | 159.57 |
| 14 | 1300 | 174.03 |
| 15 | 1400 | 164.14 |
| 16 | 1500 | 162.18 |
| 17 | 1600 | 182.68 |
| 18 | 1700 | 169.15 |
| 19 | 1800 | 170.59 |
| 20 | 1900 | 164.78 |
| 21 | 2000 | 172.28 |
| 22 | 2100 | 163.83 |
| 23 | 2200 | 160.10 |
| 24 | 2300 | 160.92 |
| 25 | 2400 | 163.07 |
| 26 | 2500 | 167.79 |
| 27 | 2600 | 161.17 |
| 28 | 2700 | 164.70 |
| 29 | 2800 | 162.48 |
| 30 | 2900 | 165.08 |
| 31 | 3000 | 161.54 |
| 32 | 3100 | 158.84 |
| 33 | 3200 | 159.96 |
| 34 | 3300 | 158.44 |
| 35 | 3400 | 168.61 |
| 36 | 3500 | 164.02 |
| 37 | 3600 | 172.45 |
| 38 | 3700 | 162.87 |
| 39 | 3800 | 164.27 |
| 40 | 3900 | 164.14 |
| 41 | 4000 | 162.68 |
| 42 | 4100 | 174.48 |
| 43 | 4200 | 165.43 |
| 44 | 4300 | 162.52 |
| 45 | 4400 | 168.76 |
| 46 | 4500 | 164.99 |
| 47 | 4600 | 173.24 |
| 48 | 4700 | 166.30 |
| 49 | 4800 | 164.68 |
| 50 | 4900 | 172.18 |
Download This Route's Data
This route's measurement round is published as open data (CC BY 4.0) in CSV, JSON, and YAML. See About This Measurement for citation guidance.
Download this dataset
Per-route ICMP ping series, released under CC BY 4.0. Uncompressed plain text — no decompression step needed.
Theoretical Fiber Latency
The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Moscow (55.75204, 37.61781) and Seattle (47.60621, -122.33207). It does not disclose either facility address.
| Physical Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| WGS-84 geodesic distance | 8,396.9 km |
| Vacuum RTT floor | 56.02 ms |
| Standard fiber RTT floor () | 82.23 ms |
| Low-latency fiber material floor | 81.9 ms |
| Engineering floor (5% path allowance) | 86.35 ms |
| Research 1.33× mapped-fiber reference | 109.36 ms |
| Estimated unamplified path loss | 1763.3 dB |
| Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers | 111 / 110 |
| Published RTT inflation over fiber floor | 2.01× |
Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.
Stability & Trend
The current measurement round (2026-08-15T04:03:13Z) collected 50 ICMP echo samples on this route. Distribution statistics from that round:
| Round Statistic | Value |
|---|---|
| Minimum RTT | 158.26 ms |
| Average RTT | 165.2 ms |
| Maximum RTT | 182.68 ms |
| Standard deviation | 5.33 ms |
| Stdev / average | 3.2% |
RTT trend
Estimated route stability across the selected time window.
- Average
- 164.8 ms
- Minimum
- 163.4 ms
- Maximum
- 165.9 ms
- Average loss
- 0.01%
Route Context
- Departure PoP: Moscow (MOW)
- Destination PoP: Seattle (SEA)
- Region overview: Europe → North America
- Corridor overview: Europe to North America
- Full global matrix: Backbone Latency Matrix
- Physical methodology: Theoretical Fiber Latency
Related City-Pair Routes
Reverse direction
- Seattle to Moscow latency and RTT — 164.6 ms
Fastest routes departing Moscow (MOW)
- Moscow to Berlin latency and RTT — 27 ms
- Moscow to Frankfurt latency and RTT — 35 ms
- Moscow to Amsterdam latency and RTT — 39.3 ms
- Moscow to London latency and RTT — 42.4 ms
- Moscow to Paris latency and RTT — 43.9 ms
Fastest routes arriving at Seattle (SEA)
- Los Angeles to Seattle latency and RTT — 27.5 ms
- New York to Seattle latency and RTT — 59 ms
- Ashburn to Seattle latency and RTT — 61.3 ms
- Miami to Seattle latency and RTT — 82 ms
- Tokyo to Seattle latency and RTT — 84.6 ms
Same corridor (Europe → North America)
- London to New York latency and RTT — 63.5 ms
- Amsterdam to New York latency and RTT — 68.2 ms
- Paris to New York latency and RTT — 68.6 ms
About This Measurement
Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior measured with ICMP echo probes between PoPs. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. None of these values is an SLA.
The measurement round behind this page is published as open data under CC BY 4.0 in the Hats Network latency dataset. Per-pair files are available at /opendata/latency/latest/pairs/mow-sea.pings.{csv,json,yaml}. When citing, include the route, the measurement round timestamp, and the dataset version — for example: "Hats Network latency dataset, Moscow → Seattle round 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z, CC BY 4.0".
Data auto-generated on August 15, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.