Miami, USA → Melbourne, Australia RTT
Statistics for ICMP round-trip time from Miami, USA to Melbourne, Australia: 200.7 ms average, jitter, packet loss and min/max latency.
🇺🇸 Miami, USA (MIA) → 🇦🇺 Melbourne, Australia (MEL)
Measurement round: 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z.
In the 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z round, ICMP echo RTT from Miami to Melbourne averaged 200.7 ms over 50 samples, with a minimum of 194.14 ms, a maximum of 218.98 ms, and no packet loss. The standard deviation of 5.43 ms and jitter of 4.3 ms make this a notably steady long-haul route.
Melbourne sits roughly 15,591.9 km from Miami, so the fiber floor is about 152.69 ms; the measured RTT is 1.31 times that floor, or 76.1% fiber efficiency. It was ranked 17th of 19 outbound routes in the same round, a position consistent with the long physical distance to Melbourne's southern Australian backbone.
The observed spread is roughly 2.7% of the average RTT, below the 3.08% median across the route set. That combination of low loss, moderate jitter, and better-than-median stability makes Miami-to-Melbourne a dependable path when consistent latency matters more than raw RTT.
Latency Summary
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| RTT | 200.7 ms |
| Jitter | 4.3 ms |
| Packet Loss | 0% |
| Standard Fiber Floor | 152.69 ms |
| Fiber Efficiency | 76.1% |
| Latency Tier | Fair |
| Source Region | North America |
| Destination Region | Asia Pacific |
Ping Measurement Series
The chart below renders the 50-sample ICMP echo measurement round for this route; an accessible table of every sample is included with the chart.
Ping series: MIA → MEL
50 ICMP echo samples at 100 ms intervals · round 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z · avg 200.7 ± 0.77 ms (SE)
Sample distribution: box = interquartile range (196.8–202.7 ms), median 199.6 ms · whiskers = min–max · diamond = round average · each dot is one measured sample.
How to read this chart
The shaded band spans the measured minimum to maximum RTT of all samples collected up to that point, and the thin line traces the running average. The final position therefore matches the round statistics exactly — the band only widens when a new extreme sample arrives.
The dashed line is the round average, and the shaded band at the bottom is the theoretical fiber-optic floor (152.7 ms) for this route.
Full 50-sample dataset
| Seq | Offset (ms) | RTT (ms) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 195.33 |
| 2 | 100 | 194.14 |
| 3 | 200 | 203.77 |
| 4 | 300 | 197.06 |
| 5 | 400 | 195.05 |
| 6 | 500 | 195.30 |
| 7 | 600 | 195.06 |
| 8 | 700 | 198.79 |
| 9 | 800 | 196.96 |
| 10 | 900 | 199.95 |
| 11 | 1000 | 195.51 |
| 12 | 1100 | 200.82 |
| 13 | 1200 | 206.76 |
| 14 | 1300 | 213.36 |
| 15 | 1400 | 210.43 |
| 16 | 1500 | 202.74 |
| 17 | 1600 | 200.66 |
| 18 | 1700 | 202.53 |
| 19 | 1800 | 199.29 |
| 20 | 1900 | 200.23 |
| 21 | 2000 | 218.98 |
| 22 | 2100 | 212.37 |
| 23 | 2200 | 202.69 |
| 24 | 2300 | 200.46 |
| 25 | 2400 | 196.18 |
| 26 | 2500 | 202.63 |
| 27 | 2600 | 200.62 |
| 28 | 2700 | 210.68 |
| 29 | 2800 | 203.25 |
| 30 | 2900 | 197.24 |
| 31 | 3000 | 194.76 |
| 32 | 3100 | 206.79 |
| 33 | 3200 | 202.54 |
| 34 | 3300 | 204.20 |
| 35 | 3400 | 202.72 |
| 36 | 3500 | 207.22 |
| 37 | 3600 | 198.85 |
| 38 | 3700 | 199.87 |
| 39 | 3800 | 197.36 |
| 40 | 3900 | 202.82 |
| 41 | 4000 | 197.08 |
| 42 | 4100 | 197.63 |
| 43 | 4200 | 194.94 |
| 44 | 4300 | 199.27 |
| 45 | 4400 | 197.93 |
| 46 | 4500 | 196.15 |
| 47 | 4600 | 196.68 |
| 48 | 4700 | 196.08 |
| 49 | 4800 | 194.38 |
| 50 | 4900 | 198.89 |
Download This Route's Data
This route's measurement round is published as open data (CC BY 4.0) in CSV, JSON, and YAML. See About This Measurement for citation guidance.
Download this dataset
Per-route ICMP ping series, released under CC BY 4.0. Uncompressed plain text — no decompression step needed.
Theoretical Fiber Latency
The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Miami (25.77427, -80.19366) and Melbourne (-37.81400, 144.96332). It does not disclose either facility address.
| Physical Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| WGS-84 geodesic distance | 15,591.9 km |
| Vacuum RTT floor | 104.02 ms |
| Standard fiber RTT floor () | 152.69 ms |
| Low-latency fiber material floor | 152.07 ms |
| Engineering floor (5% path allowance) | 160.34 ms |
| Research 1.33× mapped-fiber reference | 203.07 ms |
| Estimated unamplified path loss | 3274.3 dB |
| Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers | 205 / 204 |
| Published RTT inflation over fiber floor | 1.31× |
Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.
Stability & Trend
The current measurement round (2026-08-15T04:03:13Z) collected 50 ICMP echo samples on this route. Distribution statistics from that round:
| Round Statistic | Value |
|---|---|
| Minimum RTT | 194.14 ms |
| Average RTT | 200.7 ms |
| Maximum RTT | 218.98 ms |
| Standard deviation | 5.43 ms |
| Stdev / average | 2.7% |
RTT trend
Estimated route stability across the selected time window.
- Average
- 201.0 ms
- Minimum
- 199.3 ms
- Maximum
- 202.5 ms
- Average loss
- 0.03%
Route Context
- Departure PoP: Miami (MIA)
- Destination PoP: Melbourne (MEL)
- Region overview: North America → Asia Pacific
- Corridor overview: North America to Asia Pacific
- Full global matrix: Backbone Latency Matrix
- Physical methodology: Theoretical Fiber Latency
Related City-Pair Routes
Reverse direction
- Melbourne to Miami latency and RTT — 200.2 ms
Fastest routes departing Miami (MIA)
- Miami to Ashburn latency and RTT — 27.3 ms
- Miami to New York latency and RTT — 34 ms
- Miami to Los Angeles latency and RTT — 56.8 ms
- Miami to Seattle latency and RTT — 82 ms
- Miami to London latency and RTT — 100.7 ms
Fastest routes arriving at Melbourne (MEL)
- Sydney to Melbourne latency and RTT — 9.8 ms
- Singapore to Melbourne latency and RTT — 87.8 ms
- Tokyo to Melbourne latency and RTT — 111.3 ms
- Hong Kong to Melbourne latency and RTT — 137.4 ms
- Taipei to Melbourne latency and RTT — 143.6 ms
Same corridor (North America → Asia Pacific)
- Seattle to Tokyo latency and RTT — 84.8 ms
- Los Angeles to Tokyo latency and RTT — 100.9 ms
- Seattle to Taipei latency and RTT — 115.1 ms
About This Measurement
Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior measured with ICMP echo probes between PoPs. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. None of these values is an SLA.
The measurement round behind this page is published as open data under CC BY 4.0 in the Hats Network latency dataset. Per-pair files are available at /opendata/latency/latest/pairs/mia-mel.pings.{csv,json,yaml}. When citing, include the route, the measurement round timestamp, and the dataset version — for example: "Hats Network latency dataset, Miami → Melbourne round 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z, CC BY 4.0".
Data auto-generated on August 15, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.