Hats Network | LogoHats Network
NetworkLatencyPairs

Melbourne to Moscow Latency, Ping & RTT | AS203314

Melbourne to Moscow ping and RTT: 238.1 ms, 2.48 ms jitter, 141.13 ms fiber floor, and 59.3% efficiency across AS203314. Updated 2026-07-19.

πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί This page compares the published ping and round-trip time (RTT) from Melbourne (MEL) to πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί Moscow (MOW) with vacuum and optical-fiber physical limits.

Latency Summary

MetricValue
RTT238.1 ms
Jitter2.48 ms
Packet Loss0.09%
Standard Fiber Floor141.13 ms
Fiber Efficiency59.3%
Latency TierFair
Source RegionAsia Pacific
Destination RegionEurope

Theoretical Fiber Latency

The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Melbourne (-37.81400, 144.96332) and Moscow (55.75204, 37.61781). It does not disclose either facility address.

Physical ReferenceValue
WGS-84 geodesic distance14,412.1 km
Vacuum RTT floor96.15 ms
Standard fiber RTT floor (ng=1.4679n_g=1.4679)141.13 ms
Low-latency fiber material floor140.57 ms
Engineering floor (5% path allowance)148.21 ms
Research 1.33Γ— mapped-fiber reference187.71 ms
Estimated unamplified path loss3026.5 dB
Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers190 / 189
Published RTT inflation over fiber floor1.69Γ—

Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.

Stability & Trend

The following estimated indicators summarize route stability for the current publication period and are intended for comparative planning rather than SLA evaluation.

Stability IndicatorValue
Minimum RTT235 ms
Median RTT (p50)237.9 ms
95th percentile RTT (p95)241.4 ms
Maximum RTT243 ms
Jitter2.48 ms
Packet loss0.09%

RTT trend

Estimated route stability across the selected time window.

Average
238.0 ms
Minimum
236.2 ms
Maximum
240.7 ms
Average loss
0.02%

Route Context

About This Measurement

Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. Stability indicators are comparative estimates, and none of these values is an SLA.


Data auto-generated on July 19, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.

On this page