Melbourne, Australia → Moscow, Russia RTT
Melbourne, Australia to Moscow, Russia latency report: ICMP echo round-trip time, packet loss, jitter, and fiber efficiency from the measurement round.
🇦🇺 Melbourne, Australia (MEL) → 🇷🇺 Moscow, Russia (MOW)
Measurement round: 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z.
In round 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z, ICMP echo probes from Melbourne to Moscow averaged 235.9 ms across 50 samples, with a minimum of 229.28 ms and a maximum of 265 ms. The route recorded zero packet loss and remained in the fair latency tier.
The average is 1.67 times the theoretical direct-fiber floor of 141.13 ms, for a fiber efficiency of 59.8%. That larger overhead, along with jitter of 5.43 ms, indicates the path is noticeably less direct than the straight-line fiber ideal.
Among the 19 outbound routes from this Melbourne vantage point, the route ranked 12th by RTT. Its standard deviation of about 7 ms worked out to roughly 3.0% of the average, slightly calmer than the median variability of 3.08% seen across the route set.
Latency Summary
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| RTT | 235.9 ms |
| Jitter | 5.43 ms |
| Packet Loss | 0% |
| Standard Fiber Floor | 141.13 ms |
| Fiber Efficiency | 59.8% |
| Latency Tier | Fair |
| Source Region | Asia Pacific |
| Destination Region | Europe |
Ping Measurement Series
The chart below renders the 50-sample ICMP echo measurement round for this route; an accessible table of every sample is included with the chart.
Ping series: MEL → MOW
50 ICMP echo samples at 100 ms intervals · round 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z · avg 235.9 ± 1.00 ms (SE)
Sample distribution: box = interquartile range (231.2–237.3 ms), median 232.8 ms · whiskers = min–max · diamond = round average · each dot is one measured sample.
How to read this chart
The shaded band spans the measured minimum to maximum RTT of all samples collected up to that point, and the thin line traces the running average. The final position therefore matches the round statistics exactly — the band only widens when a new extreme sample arrives.
The dashed line is the round average, and the shaded band at the bottom is the theoretical fiber-optic floor (141.1 ms) for this route.
Full 50-sample dataset
| Seq | Offset (ms) | RTT (ms) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 231.09 |
| 2 | 100 | 231.30 |
| 3 | 200 | 235.84 |
| 4 | 300 | 231.21 |
| 5 | 400 | 231.35 |
| 6 | 500 | 232.28 |
| 7 | 600 | 230.08 |
| 8 | 700 | 234.93 |
| 9 | 800 | 234.61 |
| 10 | 900 | 247.98 |
| 11 | 1000 | 235.32 |
| 12 | 1100 | 235.64 |
| 13 | 1200 | 230.77 |
| 14 | 1300 | 232.94 |
| 15 | 1400 | 232.56 |
| 16 | 1500 | 245.84 |
| 17 | 1600 | 242.93 |
| 18 | 1700 | 236.04 |
| 19 | 1800 | 235.80 |
| 20 | 1900 | 231.31 |
| 21 | 2000 | 233.14 |
| 22 | 2100 | 242.33 |
| 23 | 2200 | 235.25 |
| 24 | 2300 | 234.08 |
| 25 | 2400 | 230.49 |
| 26 | 2500 | 230.69 |
| 27 | 2600 | 231.56 |
| 28 | 2700 | 251.56 |
| 29 | 2800 | 241.56 |
| 30 | 2900 | 265.00 |
| 31 | 3000 | 247.36 |
| 32 | 3100 | 235.13 |
| 33 | 3200 | 230.43 |
| 34 | 3300 | 232.68 |
| 35 | 3400 | 230.56 |
| 36 | 3500 | 232.73 |
| 37 | 3600 | 232.38 |
| 38 | 3700 | 244.49 |
| 39 | 3800 | 241.75 |
| 40 | 3900 | 237.78 |
| 41 | 4000 | 232.61 |
| 42 | 4100 | 231.15 |
| 43 | 4200 | 230.17 |
| 44 | 4300 | 232.12 |
| 45 | 4400 | 230.55 |
| 46 | 4500 | 229.28 |
| 47 | 4600 | 237.78 |
| 48 | 4700 | 231.90 |
| 49 | 4800 | 229.47 |
| 50 | 4900 | 249.20 |
Download This Route's Data
This route's measurement round is published as open data (CC BY 4.0) in CSV, JSON, and YAML. See About This Measurement for citation guidance.
Download this dataset
Per-route ICMP ping series, released under CC BY 4.0. Uncompressed plain text — no decompression step needed.
Theoretical Fiber Latency
The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Melbourne (-37.81400, 144.96332) and Moscow (55.75204, 37.61781). It does not disclose either facility address.
| Physical Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| WGS-84 geodesic distance | 14,412.1 km |
| Vacuum RTT floor | 96.15 ms |
| Standard fiber RTT floor () | 141.13 ms |
| Low-latency fiber material floor | 140.57 ms |
| Engineering floor (5% path allowance) | 148.21 ms |
| Research 1.33× mapped-fiber reference | 187.71 ms |
| Estimated unamplified path loss | 3026.5 dB |
| Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers | 190 / 189 |
| Published RTT inflation over fiber floor | 1.67× |
Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.
Stability & Trend
The current measurement round (2026-08-15T04:03:13Z) collected 50 ICMP echo samples on this route. Distribution statistics from that round:
| Round Statistic | Value |
|---|---|
| Minimum RTT | 229.28 ms |
| Average RTT | 235.9 ms |
| Maximum RTT | 265 ms |
| Standard deviation | 7.04 ms |
| Stdev / average | 3.0% |
RTT trend
Estimated route stability across the selected time window.
- Average
- 236.0 ms
- Minimum
- 233.9 ms
- Maximum
- 238.3 ms
- Average loss
- 0.02%
Route Context
- Departure PoP: Melbourne (MEL)
- Destination PoP: Moscow (MOW)
- Region overview: Asia Pacific → Europe
- Full global matrix: Backbone Latency Matrix
- Physical methodology: Theoretical Fiber Latency
Related City-Pair Routes
Reverse direction
- Moscow to Melbourne latency and RTT — 236.1 ms
Fastest routes departing Melbourne (MEL)
- Melbourne to Sydney latency and RTT — 9.8 ms
- Melbourne to Singapore latency and RTT — 88.3 ms
- Melbourne to Tokyo latency and RTT — 113.2 ms
- Melbourne to Hong Kong latency and RTT — 137.4 ms
- Melbourne to Taipei latency and RTT — 141.7 ms
Fastest routes arriving at Moscow (MOW)
- Berlin to Moscow latency and RTT — 28 ms
- Frankfurt to Moscow latency and RTT — 34.8 ms
- Amsterdam to Moscow latency and RTT — 38.2 ms
- London to Moscow latency and RTT — 44.1 ms
- Paris to Moscow latency and RTT — 44.5 ms
Same corridor (Asia Pacific → Europe)
- Hong Kong to Moscow latency and RTT — 116.6 ms
- Taipei to Moscow latency and RTT — 131.7 ms
- Singapore to Marseille latency and RTT — 138.8 ms
About This Measurement
Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior measured with ICMP echo probes between PoPs. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. None of these values is an SLA.
The measurement round behind this page is published as open data under CC BY 4.0 in the Hats Network latency dataset. Per-pair files are available at /opendata/latency/latest/pairs/mel-mow.pings.{csv,json,yaml}. When citing, include the route, the measurement round timestamp, and the dataset version — for example: "Hats Network latency dataset, Melbourne → Moscow round 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z, CC BY 4.0".
Data auto-generated on August 15, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.