Hats Network | LogoHats Network
NetworkLatencyPairs

Melbourne to Amsterdam Latency, Ping & RTT | AS203314

Melbourne to Amsterdam ping and RTT: 245.1 ms, 2.9 ms jitter, 161.98 ms fiber floor, and 66.1% efficiency across AS203314. Updated 2026-07-19.

πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί This page compares the published ping and round-trip time (RTT) from Melbourne (MEL) to πŸ‡³πŸ‡± Amsterdam (AMS) with vacuum and optical-fiber physical limits.

Latency Summary

MetricValue
RTT245.1 ms
Jitter2.9 ms
Packet Loss0.05%
Standard Fiber Floor161.98 ms
Fiber Efficiency66.1%
Latency TierFair
Source RegionAsia Pacific
Destination RegionEurope

Theoretical Fiber Latency

The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Melbourne (-37.81400, 144.96332) and Amsterdam (52.37403, 4.88969). It does not disclose either facility address.

Physical ReferenceValue
WGS-84 geodesic distance16,540.5 km
Vacuum RTT floor110.35 ms
Standard fiber RTT floor (ng=1.4679n_g=1.4679)161.98 ms
Low-latency fiber material floor161.33 ms
Engineering floor (5% path allowance)170.1 ms
Research 1.33Γ— mapped-fiber reference215.43 ms
Estimated unamplified path loss3473.5 dB
Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers218 / 217
Published RTT inflation over fiber floor1.51Γ—

Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.

Stability & Trend

The following estimated indicators summarize route stability for the current publication period and are intended for comparative planning rather than SLA evaluation.

Stability IndicatorValue
Minimum RTT241.9 ms
Median RTT (p50)244.7 ms
95th percentile RTT (p95)250 ms
Maximum RTT250.6 ms
Jitter2.9 ms
Packet loss0.05%

RTT trend

Estimated route stability across the selected time window.

Average
244.8 ms
Minimum
242.5 ms
Maximum
247.0 ms
Average loss
0.01%

Route Context

About This Measurement

Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. Stability indicators are comparative estimates, and none of these values is an SLA.


Data auto-generated on July 19, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.

On this page