Hong Kong → Los Angeles, USA RTT
Live ICMP RTT data for Hong Kong (HKG) to Los Angeles (USA): 147.1 ms average latency, 0% loss, with technical context for this Pacific route.
🇭🇰 Hong Kong (HKG) → 🇺🇸 Los Angeles, USA (LAX)
Measurement round: 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z.
In the 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z round, ICMP echo requests from Hong Kong to Los Angeles returned an average RTT of 147.1 ms, with a minimum of 143.73 ms and a maximum of 161.41 ms.
All 50 probes were answered, so reported packet loss is 0%. That average is 1.29 times the theoretical fiber-path floor of 114.3 ms implied by the 11,671.5 km geodesic distance, putting the route at roughly 77.7% fiber efficiency.
The observed jitter of 2.33 ms and a standard deviation of 3.2 ms show a tight distribution around the mean. The route ranks 9th among 19 outbound paths from Hong Kong, and its stdev-to-average ratio is below the 3.08% network median, making this a relatively stable Pacific route in the sample.
Latency Summary
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| RTT | 147.1 ms |
| Jitter | 2.33 ms |
| Packet Loss | 0% |
| Standard Fiber Floor | 114.3 ms |
| Fiber Efficiency | 77.7% |
| Latency Tier | Good |
| Source Region | Asia Pacific |
| Destination Region | North America |
Ping Measurement Series
The chart below renders the 50-sample ICMP echo measurement round for this route; an accessible table of every sample is included with the chart.
Ping series: HKG → LAX
50 ICMP echo samples at 100 ms intervals · round 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z · avg 147.1 ± 0.45 ms (SE)
Sample distribution: box = interquartile range (145.1–148.3 ms), median 146.3 ms · whiskers = min–max · diamond = round average · each dot is one measured sample.
How to read this chart
The shaded band spans the measured minimum to maximum RTT of all samples collected up to that point, and the thin line traces the running average. The final position therefore matches the round statistics exactly — the band only widens when a new extreme sample arrives.
The dashed line is the round average, and the shaded band at the bottom is the theoretical fiber-optic floor (114.3 ms) for this route.
Full 50-sample dataset
| Seq | Offset (ms) | RTT (ms) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 146.76 |
| 2 | 100 | 145.12 |
| 3 | 200 | 146.63 |
| 4 | 300 | 161.41 |
| 5 | 400 | 149.73 |
| 6 | 500 | 152.39 |
| 7 | 600 | 148.35 |
| 8 | 700 | 149.17 |
| 9 | 800 | 145.49 |
| 10 | 900 | 143.87 |
| 11 | 1000 | 147.34 |
| 12 | 1100 | 150.21 |
| 13 | 1200 | 147.02 |
| 14 | 1300 | 147.56 |
| 15 | 1400 | 145.04 |
| 16 | 1500 | 144.93 |
| 17 | 1600 | 144.34 |
| 18 | 1700 | 145.43 |
| 19 | 1800 | 146.45 |
| 20 | 1900 | 146.75 |
| 21 | 2000 | 144.90 |
| 22 | 2100 | 143.91 |
| 23 | 2200 | 143.73 |
| 24 | 2300 | 143.83 |
| 25 | 2400 | 150.92 |
| 26 | 2500 | 151.88 |
| 27 | 2600 | 150.32 |
| 28 | 2700 | 148.48 |
| 29 | 2800 | 147.67 |
| 30 | 2900 | 146.25 |
| 31 | 3000 | 144.22 |
| 32 | 3100 | 144.86 |
| 33 | 3200 | 145.31 |
| 34 | 3300 | 145.63 |
| 35 | 3400 | 144.07 |
| 36 | 3500 | 145.13 |
| 37 | 3600 | 147.37 |
| 38 | 3700 | 145.20 |
| 39 | 3800 | 144.60 |
| 40 | 3900 | 143.93 |
| 41 | 4000 | 151.74 |
| 42 | 4100 | 148.34 |
| 43 | 4200 | 146.35 |
| 44 | 4300 | 146.06 |
| 45 | 4400 | 146.53 |
| 46 | 4500 | 145.99 |
| 47 | 4600 | 145.18 |
| 48 | 4700 | 145.61 |
| 49 | 4800 | 153.49 |
| 50 | 4900 | 149.51 |
Download This Route's Data
This route's measurement round is published as open data (CC BY 4.0) in CSV, JSON, and YAML. See About This Measurement for citation guidance.
Download this dataset
Per-route ICMP ping series, released under CC BY 4.0. Uncompressed plain text — no decompression step needed.
Theoretical Fiber Latency
The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Hong Kong (22.27832, 114.17469) and Los Angeles (34.05223, -118.24368). It does not disclose either facility address.
| Physical Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| WGS-84 geodesic distance | 11,671.5 km |
| Vacuum RTT floor | 77.86 ms |
| Standard fiber RTT floor () | 114.3 ms |
| Low-latency fiber material floor | 113.84 ms |
| Engineering floor (5% path allowance) | 120.03 ms |
| Research 1.33× mapped-fiber reference | 152.01 ms |
| Estimated unamplified path loss | 2451 dB |
| Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers | 154 / 153 |
| Published RTT inflation over fiber floor | 1.29× |
Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.
Stability & Trend
The current measurement round (2026-08-15T04:03:13Z) collected 50 ICMP echo samples on this route. Distribution statistics from that round:
| Round Statistic | Value |
|---|---|
| Minimum RTT | 143.73 ms |
| Average RTT | 147.1 ms |
| Maximum RTT | 161.41 ms |
| Standard deviation | 3.2 ms |
| Stdev / average | 2.2% |
RTT trend
Estimated route stability across the selected time window.
- Average
- 147.3 ms
- Minimum
- 145.8 ms
- Maximum
- 148.3 ms
- Average loss
- 0.02%
Route Context
- Departure PoP: Hong Kong (HKG)
- Destination PoP: Los Angeles (LAX)
- Region overview: Asia Pacific → North America
- Full global matrix: Backbone Latency Matrix
- Physical methodology: Theoretical Fiber Latency
Related City-Pair Routes
Reverse direction
- Los Angeles to Hong Kong latency and RTT — 145.9 ms
Fastest routes departing Hong Kong (HKG)
- Hong Kong to Taipei latency and RTT — 15.2 ms
- Hong Kong to Singapore latency and RTT — 31.2 ms
- Hong Kong to Tokyo latency and RTT — 45 ms
- Hong Kong to Moscow latency and RTT — 116.6 ms
- Hong Kong to Seattle latency and RTT — 129.9 ms
Fastest routes arriving at Los Angeles (LAX)
- Seattle to Los Angeles latency and RTT — 26.6 ms
- Miami to Los Angeles latency and RTT — 56.8 ms
- New York to Los Angeles latency and RTT — 58 ms
- Ashburn to Los Angeles latency and RTT — 60 ms
- Tokyo to Los Angeles latency and RTT — 101.5 ms
Same corridor (Asia Pacific → North America)
- Tokyo to Seattle latency and RTT — 84.6 ms
- Taipei to Seattle latency and RTT — 115.7 ms
- Taipei to Los Angeles latency and RTT — 132.9 ms
About This Measurement
Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior measured with ICMP echo probes between PoPs. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. None of these values is an SLA.
The measurement round behind this page is published as open data under CC BY 4.0 in the Hats Network latency dataset. Per-pair files are available at /opendata/latency/latest/pairs/hkg-lax.pings.{csv,json,yaml}. When citing, include the route, the measurement round timestamp, and the dataset version — for example: "Hats Network latency dataset, Hong Kong → Los Angeles round 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z, CC BY 4.0".
Data auto-generated on August 15, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.