Hats Network | LogoHats Network
NetworkLatencyPairs

São Paulo to Hong Kong Latency, Ping & RTT | AS203314

São Paulo to Hong Kong ping and RTT: 275.2 ms, 1.87 ms jitter, 176.86 ms fiber floor, and 64.3% efficiency across AS203314. Updated 2026-07-19.

🇧🇷 This page compares the published ping and round-trip time (RTT) from São Paulo (GRU) to 🇭🇰 Hong Kong (HKG) with vacuum and optical-fiber physical limits.

Latency Summary

MetricValue
RTT275.2 ms
Jitter1.87 ms
Packet Loss0%
Standard Fiber Floor176.86 ms
Fiber Efficiency64.3%
Latency TierHigh
Source RegionSouth America
Destination RegionAsia Pacific

Theoretical Fiber Latency

The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for São Paulo (-23.54750, -46.63611) and Hong Kong (22.27832, 114.17469). It does not disclose either facility address.

Physical ReferenceValue
WGS-84 geodesic distance18,060 km
Vacuum RTT floor120.48 ms
Standard fiber RTT floor (ng=1.4679n_g=1.4679)176.86 ms
Low-latency fiber material floor176.15 ms
Engineering floor (5% path allowance)185.72 ms
Research 1.33× mapped-fiber reference235.22 ms
Estimated unamplified path loss3792.6 dB
Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers238 / 237
Published RTT inflation over fiber floor1.56×

Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.

Stability & Trend

The following estimated indicators summarize route stability for the current publication period and are intended for comparative planning rather than SLA evaluation.

Stability IndicatorValue
Minimum RTT273.1 ms
Median RTT (p50)275 ms
95th percentile RTT (p95)278.1 ms
Maximum RTT279.2 ms
Jitter1.87 ms
Packet loss0%

RTT trend

Estimated route stability across the selected time window.

Average
275.5 ms
Minimum
272.8 ms
Maximum
277.2 ms
Average loss
0.04%

Route Context

About This Measurement

Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. Stability indicators are comparative estimates, and none of these values is an SLA.


Data auto-generated on July 19, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.

On this page