Frankfurt, Germany → Hong Kong RTT
Frankfurt, Germany to Hong Kong, Hong Kong ICMP RTT measurement: 151.2 ms average, 146.58–165.36 ms range, zero packet loss over 50 samples.
🇩🇪 Frankfurt, Germany (FRA) → 🇭🇰 Hong Kong (HKG)
Measurement round: 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z.
Round 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z measured Frankfurt, Germany to Hong Kong at 151.2 ms average ICMP RTT, with a 146.58 ms minimum and 165.36 ms maximum across 50 samples and zero packet loss.
The 9,177.1 km great-circle distance gives a 61.22 ms vacuum round-trip floor and an 89.87 ms fiber round-trip floor; the measured 151.2 ms is 1.68 times the fiber floor, translating to about 59% fiber efficiency for this Asia-Pacific path.
This route ranked 12th among the 19 outbound routes in the same round. Its 4.14 ms standard deviation equals roughly 2.7% of the average, below the round's median spread of 3.08%, and jitter of 3.56 ms with no loss makes the Fair tier both usable and steady.
Latency Summary
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| RTT | 151.2 ms |
| Jitter | 3.56 ms |
| Packet Loss | 0% |
| Standard Fiber Floor | 89.87 ms |
| Fiber Efficiency | 59.4% |
| Latency Tier | Fair |
| Source Region | Europe |
| Destination Region | Asia Pacific |
Ping Measurement Series
The chart below renders the 50-sample ICMP echo measurement round for this route; an accessible table of every sample is included with the chart.
Ping series: FRA → HKG
50 ICMP echo samples at 100 ms intervals · round 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z · avg 151.2 ± 0.59 ms (SE)
Sample distribution: box = interquartile range (148.1–153.4 ms), median 149.9 ms · whiskers = min–max · diamond = round average · each dot is one measured sample.
How to read this chart
The shaded band spans the measured minimum to maximum RTT of all samples collected up to that point, and the thin line traces the running average. The final position therefore matches the round statistics exactly — the band only widens when a new extreme sample arrives.
The dashed line is the round average, and the shaded band at the bottom is the theoretical fiber-optic floor (89.9 ms) for this route.
Full 50-sample dataset
| Seq | Offset (ms) | RTT (ms) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 165.36 |
| 2 | 100 | 155.33 |
| 3 | 200 | 156.10 |
| 4 | 300 | 152.58 |
| 5 | 400 | 161.40 |
| 6 | 500 | 154.62 |
| 7 | 600 | 148.89 |
| 8 | 700 | 148.15 |
| 9 | 800 | 155.69 |
| 10 | 900 | 150.32 |
| 11 | 1000 | 147.23 |
| 12 | 1100 | 147.41 |
| 13 | 1200 | 148.60 |
| 14 | 1300 | 149.21 |
| 15 | 1400 | 147.33 |
| 16 | 1500 | 146.58 |
| 17 | 1600 | 150.66 |
| 18 | 1700 | 147.82 |
| 19 | 1800 | 147.59 |
| 20 | 1900 | 151.54 |
| 21 | 2000 | 154.17 |
| 22 | 2100 | 149.40 |
| 23 | 2200 | 157.40 |
| 24 | 2300 | 151.94 |
| 25 | 2400 | 153.70 |
| 26 | 2500 | 148.36 |
| 27 | 2600 | 152.42 |
| 28 | 2700 | 150.85 |
| 29 | 2800 | 147.46 |
| 30 | 2900 | 147.97 |
| 31 | 3000 | 148.07 |
| 32 | 3100 | 149.27 |
| 33 | 3200 | 148.83 |
| 34 | 3300 | 148.69 |
| 35 | 3400 | 146.61 |
| 36 | 3500 | 155.36 |
| 37 | 3600 | 151.41 |
| 38 | 3700 | 152.62 |
| 39 | 3800 | 148.58 |
| 40 | 3900 | 147.37 |
| 41 | 4000 | 151.02 |
| 42 | 4100 | 161.70 |
| 43 | 4200 | 151.48 |
| 44 | 4300 | 148.13 |
| 45 | 4400 | 147.67 |
| 46 | 4500 | 148.66 |
| 47 | 4600 | 147.22 |
| 48 | 4700 | 155.26 |
| 49 | 4800 | 151.38 |
| 50 | 4900 | 154.59 |
Download This Route's Data
This route's measurement round is published as open data (CC BY 4.0) in CSV, JSON, and YAML. See About This Measurement for citation guidance.
Download this dataset
Per-route ICMP ping series, released under CC BY 4.0. Uncompressed plain text — no decompression step needed.
Theoretical Fiber Latency
The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Frankfurt am Main (50.11552, 8.68417) and Hong Kong (22.27832, 114.17469). It does not disclose either facility address.
| Physical Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| WGS-84 geodesic distance | 9,177.1 km |
| Vacuum RTT floor | 61.22 ms |
| Standard fiber RTT floor () | 89.87 ms |
| Low-latency fiber material floor | 89.51 ms |
| Engineering floor (5% path allowance) | 94.37 ms |
| Research 1.33× mapped-fiber reference | 119.53 ms |
| Estimated unamplified path loss | 1927.2 dB |
| Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers | 121 / 120 |
| Published RTT inflation over fiber floor | 1.68× |
Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.
Stability & Trend
The current measurement round (2026-08-15T04:03:13Z) collected 50 ICMP echo samples on this route. Distribution statistics from that round:
| Round Statistic | Value |
|---|---|
| Minimum RTT | 146.58 ms |
| Average RTT | 151.2 ms |
| Maximum RTT | 165.36 ms |
| Standard deviation | 4.14 ms |
| Stdev / average | 2.7% |
RTT trend
Estimated route stability across the selected time window.
- Average
- 151.1 ms
- Minimum
- 149.8 ms
- Maximum
- 152.3 ms
- Average loss
- 0.01%
Route Context
- Departure PoP: Frankfurt (FRA)
- Destination PoP: Hong Kong (HKG)
- Region overview: Europe → Asia Pacific
- Corridor overview: Europe to Asia Pacific
- Full global matrix: Backbone Latency Matrix
- Physical methodology: Theoretical Fiber Latency
Related City-Pair Routes
Reverse direction
- Hong Kong to Frankfurt latency and RTT — 151.3 ms
Fastest routes departing Frankfurt (FRA)
- Frankfurt to Amsterdam latency and RTT — 5.9 ms
- Frankfurt to Berlin latency and RTT — 6.1 ms
- Frankfurt to Paris latency and RTT — 7.6 ms
- Frankfurt to London latency and RTT — 12.6 ms
- Frankfurt to Marseille latency and RTT — 17.2 ms
Fastest routes arriving at Hong Kong (HKG)
- Taipei to Hong Kong latency and RTT — 15.4 ms
- Singapore to Hong Kong latency and RTT — 30.9 ms
- Tokyo to Hong Kong latency and RTT — 45.6 ms
- Moscow to Hong Kong latency and RTT — 118.5 ms
- Seattle to Hong Kong latency and RTT — 130.7 ms
Same corridor (Europe → Asia Pacific)
- Moscow to Taipei latency and RTT — 130.9 ms
- Marseille to Singapore latency and RTT — 138.5 ms
- Berlin to Hong Kong latency and RTT — 143.9 ms
About This Measurement
Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior measured with ICMP echo probes between PoPs. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. None of these values is an SLA.
The measurement round behind this page is published as open data under CC BY 4.0 in the Hats Network latency dataset. Per-pair files are available at /opendata/latency/latest/pairs/fra-hkg.pings.{csv,json,yaml}. When citing, include the route, the measurement round timestamp, and the dataset version — for example: "Hats Network latency dataset, Frankfurt → Hong Kong round 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z, CC BY 4.0".
Data auto-generated on August 15, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.