Marseille, France → Johannesburg, South Africa RTT
ICMP echo RTT from Marseille, France to Johannesburg, South Africa: 198.5 ms average, 0% loss, 2.5 ms jitter, with fiber floor reference for round 2026-08-16.
🇫🇷 Marseille, France (MRS) → 🇿🇦 Johannesburg, South Africa (JNB)
Measurement round: 2026-08-16T04:07:28Z.
In the 2026-08-16T04:07:28Z round, ICMP echo RTT from Marseille to Johannesburg averaged 198.5 ms over 50 samples, with a minimum of 194.33 ms and a maximum of 207.86 ms. Packet loss was 0%, jitter was 2.5 ms, and the entire sample spread was only 13.53 ms, earning a Fair latency tier with unusually tight behavior.
At a geodesic distance of 8,037.1 km, the vacuum floor is 53.62 ms and the fiber floor is 78.71 ms. The 198.5 ms average is 2.52 times the fiber floor, or 39.7% fiber efficiency, indicating that the path's practical length is far greater than the direct Marseille–Johannesburg line.
This route was ranked 16th among the 19 outbound routes in the round, so it sits near the slower end of the set. Its standard deviation of 3.18 ms is only about 1.6% of the average RTT, well below the network-wide median of 3.28%, which makes it one of the more consistent long-distance routes in this measurement set.
Latency Summary
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| RTT | 198.5 ms |
| Jitter | 2.5 ms |
| Packet Loss | 0% |
| Standard Fiber Floor | 78.71 ms |
| Fiber Efficiency | 39.7% |
| Latency Tier | Fair |
| Source Region | Europe |
| Destination Region | Africa |
Ping Measurement Series
The chart below renders the 50-sample ICMP echo measurement round for this route; an accessible table of every sample is included with the chart.
Ping series: MRS → JNB
50 ICMP echo samples at 100 ms intervals · round 2026-08-16T04:07:28Z · avg 198.5 ± 0.45 ms (SE)
Sample distribution: box = interquartile range (196.3–199.3 ms), median 198.1 ms · whiskers = min–max · diamond = round average · each dot is one measured sample.
How to read this chart
The shaded band spans the measured minimum to maximum RTT of all samples collected up to that point, and the thin line traces the running average. The final position therefore matches the round statistics exactly — the band only widens when a new extreme sample arrives.
The dashed line is the round average, and the shaded band at the bottom is the theoretical fiber-optic floor (78.7 ms) for this route.
Full 50-sample dataset
| Seq | Offset (ms) | RTT (ms) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 198.94 |
| 2 | 100 | 207.86 |
| 3 | 200 | 199.12 |
| 4 | 300 | 199.07 |
| 5 | 400 | 207.82 |
| 6 | 500 | 206.94 |
| 7 | 600 | 200.36 |
| 8 | 700 | 197.49 |
| 9 | 800 | 196.53 |
| 10 | 900 | 200.77 |
| 11 | 1000 | 200.05 |
| 12 | 1100 | 199.73 |
| 13 | 1200 | 200.82 |
| 14 | 1300 | 198.34 |
| 15 | 1400 | 198.90 |
| 16 | 1500 | 197.60 |
| 17 | 1600 | 197.03 |
| 18 | 1700 | 198.05 |
| 19 | 1800 | 199.34 |
| 20 | 1900 | 196.92 |
| 21 | 2000 | 199.21 |
| 22 | 2100 | 195.79 |
| 23 | 2200 | 198.28 |
| 24 | 2300 | 196.94 |
| 25 | 2400 | 202.41 |
| 26 | 2500 | 198.10 |
| 27 | 2600 | 195.51 |
| 28 | 2700 | 195.87 |
| 29 | 2800 | 197.33 |
| 30 | 2900 | 198.91 |
| 31 | 3000 | 197.21 |
| 32 | 3100 | 195.48 |
| 33 | 3200 | 194.41 |
| 34 | 3300 | 195.22 |
| 35 | 3400 | 194.75 |
| 36 | 3500 | 195.77 |
| 37 | 3600 | 199.38 |
| 38 | 3700 | 204.48 |
| 39 | 3800 | 198.26 |
| 40 | 3900 | 195.33 |
| 41 | 4000 | 194.73 |
| 42 | 4100 | 194.33 |
| 43 | 4200 | 197.00 |
| 44 | 4300 | 204.08 |
| 45 | 4400 | 199.19 |
| 46 | 4500 | 198.36 |
| 47 | 4600 | 197.51 |
| 48 | 4700 | 197.24 |
| 49 | 4800 | 196.29 |
| 50 | 4900 | 195.95 |
Download This Route's Data
This route's measurement round is published as open data (CC BY 4.0) in CSV, JSON, and YAML. See About This Measurement for citation guidance.
Download this dataset
Per-route ICMP ping series, released under CC BY 4.0. Uncompressed plain text — no decompression step needed.
Theoretical Fiber Latency
The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Marseille (43.29695, 5.38107) and Johannesburg (-26.20227, 28.04363). It does not disclose either facility address.
| Physical Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| WGS-84 geodesic distance | 8,037.1 km |
| Vacuum RTT floor | 53.62 ms |
| Standard fiber RTT floor () | 78.71 ms |
| Low-latency fiber material floor | 78.39 ms |
| Engineering floor (5% path allowance) | 82.65 ms |
| Research 1.33× mapped-fiber reference | 104.68 ms |
| Estimated unamplified path loss | 1687.8 dB |
| Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers | 106 / 105 |
| Published RTT inflation over fiber floor | 2.52× |
Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.
Stability & Trend
The current measurement round (2026-08-16T04:07:28Z) collected 50 ICMP echo samples on this route. Distribution statistics from that round:
| Round Statistic | Value |
|---|---|
| Minimum RTT | 194.33 ms |
| Average RTT | 198.5 ms |
| Maximum RTT | 207.86 ms |
| Standard deviation | 3.18 ms |
| Stdev / average | 1.6% |
RTT trend
Estimated route stability across the selected time window.
- Average
- 198.7 ms
- Minimum
- 196.6 ms
- Maximum
- 200.7 ms
- Average loss
- 0.03%
Route Context
- Departure PoP: Marseille (MRS)
- Destination PoP: Johannesburg (JNB)
- Region overview: Europe → Africa
- Full global matrix: Backbone Latency Matrix
- Physical methodology: Theoretical Fiber Latency
Related City-Pair Routes
Reverse direction
Fastest routes departing Marseille (MRS)
- Marseille to Paris latency and RTT — 8.9 ms
- Marseille to Frankfurt latency and RTT — 16 ms
- Marseille to London latency and RTT — 18.9 ms
- Marseille to Amsterdam latency and RTT — 20.3 ms
- Marseille to Berlin latency and RTT — 20.6 ms
Fastest routes arriving at Johannesburg (JNB)
- Amsterdam to Johannesburg latency and RTT — 171.9 ms
- Berlin to Johannesburg latency and RTT — 172.1 ms
- London to Johannesburg latency and RTT — 179.6 ms
- Paris to Johannesburg latency and RTT — 180.9 ms
- Frankfurt to Johannesburg latency and RTT — 188.4 ms
Same corridor (Europe → Africa)
- Moscow to Johannesburg latency and RTT — 201.9 ms
About This Measurement
Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior measured with ICMP echo probes between PoPs. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. None of these values is an SLA.
The measurement round behind this page is published as open data under CC BY 4.0 in the Hats Network latency dataset. Per-pair files are available at /opendata/latency/latest/pairs/mrs-jnb.pings.{csv,json,yaml}. When citing, include the route, the measurement round timestamp, and the dataset version — for example: "Hats Network latency dataset, Marseille → Johannesburg round 2026-08-16T04:07:28Z, CC BY 4.0".
Data auto-generated on August 16, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.