Hats Network | LogoHats Network
NetworkLatencyPairs

Johannesburg, South Africa → Taipei, Taiwan RTT

ICMP round-trip time measurements from Johannesburg, South Africa to Taipei, Taiwan: 329.8 ms average, zero loss, jitter and route efficiency context.

🇿🇦 Johannesburg, South Africa (JNB) → 🇹🇼 Taipei, Taiwan (TPE)

Measurement round: 2026-08-16T04:07:28Z.

The 2026-08-16T04:07:28Z ICMP echo RTT measurement from Johannesburg, South Africa to Taipei, Taiwan returned a 329.8 ms average over 50 samples, with the minimum at 316.93 ms and the maximum at 358.31 ms. Packet loss was 0%, and the 9.77 ms standard deviation produced 9.42 ms jitter, putting this high-latency path on the stable side.

The great-circle distance between the two cities is 11,525.4 km, for which the vacuum floor is 76.89 ms and the ideal fiber path is 112.87 ms. The measured 329.8 ms average is 2.92 times that fiber floor, so the route's fiber efficiency is 34.2% - a reminder that intercontinental RTT carries far more than the straight-line distance.

In the current outbound group of 19 routes, this route is ranked 16th. Its standard deviation equals roughly 2.96% of the average, below the group's 3.28% median variability, and the narrow 41.38 ms min-to-max spread reinforces that the latency is consistent even though it is high.

Latency Summary

MetricValue
RTT329.8 ms
Jitter9.42 ms
Packet Loss0%
Standard Fiber Floor112.87 ms
Fiber Efficiency34.2%
Latency TierHigh
Source RegionAfrica
Destination RegionAsia Pacific

Ping Measurement Series

The chart below renders the 50-sample ICMP echo measurement round for this route; an accessible table of every sample is included with the chart.

Ping series: JNBTPE

50 ICMP echo samples at 100 ms intervals · round 2026-08-16T04:07:28Z · avg 329.8 ± 1.38 ms (SE)

Sample distribution: box = interquartile range (322.2333.3 ms), median 327.5 ms · whiskers = min–max · diamond = round average · each dot is one measured sample.

How to read this chart

The shaded band spans the measured minimum to maximum RTT of all samples collected up to that point, and the thin line traces the running average. The final position therefore matches the round statistics exactly — the band only widens when a new extreme sample arrives.

The dashed line is the round average, and the shaded band at the bottom is the theoretical fiber-optic floor (112.9 ms) for this route.

Full 50-sample dataset
SeqOffset (ms)RTT (ms)
10326.88
2100331.37
3200344.85
4300330.04
5400320.48
6500316.93
7600320.18
8700329.33
9800326.33
10900333.44
111000338.48
121100330.53
131200322.54
141300328.89
151400323.18
161500338.11
171600347.46
181700328.69
191800326.49
201900322.29
212000323.23
222100357.37
232200332.85
242300324.03
252400322.11
262500328.03
272600324.99
282700321.54
292800327.90
302900326.03
313000319.16
323100322.09
333200327.17
343300337.53
353400329.65
363500321.55
373600319.86
383700319.04
393800358.31
403900337.38
414000338.00
424100332.37
434200321.25
444300336.76
454400330.40
464500321.64
474600355.19
484700341.22
494800325.69
504900321.17

Download This Route's Data

This route's measurement round is published as open data (CC BY 4.0) in CSV, JSON, and YAML. See About This Measurement for citation guidance.

Download this dataset

Per-route ICMP ping series, released under CC BY 4.0. Uncompressed plain text — no decompression step needed.

Theoretical Fiber Latency

The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Johannesburg (-26.20227, 28.04363) and Taipei (25.05306, 121.52639). It does not disclose either facility address.

Physical ReferenceValue
WGS-84 geodesic distance11,525.4 km
Vacuum RTT floor76.89 ms
Standard fiber RTT floor (ng=1.4679n_g=1.4679)112.87 ms
Low-latency fiber material floor112.41 ms
Engineering floor (5% path allowance)118.52 ms
Research 1.33× mapped-fiber reference150.11 ms
Estimated unamplified path loss2420.3 dB
Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers152 / 151
Published RTT inflation over fiber floor2.92×

Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.

Stability & Trend

The current measurement round (2026-08-16T04:07:28Z) collected 50 ICMP echo samples on this route. Distribution statistics from that round:

Round StatisticValue
Minimum RTT316.93 ms
Average RTT329.8 ms
Maximum RTT358.31 ms
Standard deviation9.77 ms
Stdev / average3.0%

RTT trend

Estimated route stability across the selected time window.

Average
329.6 ms
Minimum
326.8 ms
Maximum
332.6 ms
Average loss
0.02%

Route Context

Reverse direction

Fastest routes departing Johannesburg (JNB)

Fastest routes arriving at Taipei (TPE)

Same corridor (Africa → Asia Pacific)

About This Measurement

Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior measured with ICMP echo probes between PoPs. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. None of these values is an SLA.

The measurement round behind this page is published as open data under CC BY 4.0 in the Hats Network latency dataset. Per-pair files are available at /opendata/latency/latest/pairs/jnb-tpe.pings.{csv,json,yaml}. When citing, include the route, the measurement round timestamp, and the dataset version — for example: "Hats Network latency dataset, Johannesburg → Taipei round 2026-08-16T04:07:28Z, CC BY 4.0".


Data auto-generated on August 16, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.

On this page