Hats Network | LogoHats Network
NetworkLatencyPairs

Amsterdam to Taipei Latency, Ping & RTT | AS203314

Amsterdam to Taipei ping and RTT: 170.9 ms, 1.11 ms jitter, 92.72 ms fiber floor, and 54.3% efficiency across AS203314. Updated 2026-07-19.

πŸ‡³πŸ‡± This page compares the published ping and round-trip time (RTT) from Amsterdam (AMS) to πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡Ό Taipei (TPE) with vacuum and optical-fiber physical limits.

Latency Summary

MetricValue
RTT170.9 ms
Jitter1.11 ms
Packet Loss0.1%
Standard Fiber Floor92.72 ms
Fiber Efficiency54.3%
Latency TierFair
Source RegionEurope
Destination RegionAsia Pacific

Theoretical Fiber Latency

The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Amsterdam (52.37403, 4.88969) and Taipei (25.05306, 121.52639). It does not disclose either facility address.

Physical ReferenceValue
WGS-84 geodesic distance9,467.8 km
Vacuum RTT floor63.16 ms
Standard fiber RTT floor (ng=1.4679n_g=1.4679)92.72 ms
Low-latency fiber material floor92.34 ms
Engineering floor (5% path allowance)97.36 ms
Research 1.33Γ— mapped-fiber reference123.31 ms
Estimated unamplified path loss1988.2 dB
Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers125 / 124
Published RTT inflation over fiber floor1.84Γ—

Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.

Stability & Trend

The following estimated indicators summarize route stability for the current publication period and are intended for comparative planning rather than SLA evaluation.

Stability IndicatorValue
Minimum RTT169.5 ms
Median RTT (p50)170.7 ms
95th percentile RTT (p95)172.5 ms
Maximum RTT173.5 ms
Jitter1.11 ms
Packet loss0.1%

RTT trend

Estimated route stability across the selected time window.

Average
170.9 ms
Minimum
169.1 ms
Maximum
172.6 ms
Average loss
0.01%

Route Context

About This Measurement

Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. Stability indicators are comparative estimates, and none of these values is an SLA.


Data auto-generated on July 19, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.

On this page