Hats Network | LogoHats Network
NetworkLatencyPairs

Amsterdam, Netherlands → Taipei, Taiwan RTT

Amsterdam (Netherlands) to Taipei (Taiwan) ICMP RTT summary: 168.7 ms average, 0% packet loss, 55% fiber efficiency for round 2026-08-16T04:07:28Z.

🇳🇱 Amsterdam, Netherlands (AMS) → 🇹🇼 Taipei, Taiwan (TPE)

Measurement round: 2026-08-16T04:07:28Z.

For round 2026-08-16T04:07:28Z, ICMP echo probes from Amsterdam to Taipei averaged 168.7 ms, with a minimum of 163.09 ms and a maximum of 184.23 ms over 50 samples and zero packet loss.

The 9,467.8 km geodesic distance sets a vacuum floor of 63.16 ms and a fiber floor of 92.72 ms. At 168.7 ms, the average is 1.82 times the fiber floor, which puts the route at 55% fiber efficiency and indicates more overhead than a direct straight-line fiber path would allow.

Within the round's 19 outbound routes from Amsterdam, this path ranked 14th. Its standard deviation of 4.36 ms is about 2.6% of the average—lower than the 3.28% median variation across the network's outbound route set—so the latency profile is more consistent than typical for this peer group.

The useful takeaway is that Amsterdam-Taipei RTTs are moderate and stable rather than extreme: the 168.7 ms baseline is driven mainly by distance and route overhead, while jitter of 3.84 ms and the zero-loss result reinforce that the path is steady in this round.

Latency Summary

MetricValue
RTT168.7 ms
Jitter3.84 ms
Packet Loss0%
Standard Fiber Floor92.72 ms
Fiber Efficiency55%
Latency TierFair
Source RegionEurope
Destination RegionAsia Pacific

Ping Measurement Series

The chart below renders the 50-sample ICMP echo measurement round for this route; an accessible table of every sample is included with the chart.

Ping series: AMSTPE

50 ICMP echo samples at 100 ms intervals · round 2026-08-16T04:07:28Z · avg 168.7 ± 0.62 ms (SE)

Sample distribution: box = interquartile range (166.1170.3 ms), median 167.3 ms · whiskers = min–max · diamond = round average · each dot is one measured sample.

How to read this chart

The shaded band spans the measured minimum to maximum RTT of all samples collected up to that point, and the thin line traces the running average. The final position therefore matches the round statistics exactly — the band only widens when a new extreme sample arrives.

The dashed line is the round average, and the shaded band at the bottom is the theoretical fiber-optic floor (92.7 ms) for this route.

Full 50-sample dataset
SeqOffset (ms)RTT (ms)
10164.05
2100163.09
3200164.28
4300165.80
5400166.71
6500166.00
7600168.17
8700174.51
9800170.35
10900167.82
111000167.20
121100167.42
131200168.56
141300168.76
151400173.83
161500166.49
171600165.23
181700174.03
191800167.02
201900164.77
212000168.10
222100169.12
232200165.33
242300171.33
252400170.28
262500177.65
272600170.48
282700170.04
292800167.27
302900165.29
313000184.23
323100170.25
333200167.08
343300166.57
353400165.16
363500163.61
373600164.25
383700165.36
393800167.55
403900171.80
414000166.26
424100167.28
434200170.61
444300182.96
454400169.71
464500166.60
474600166.70
484700168.17
494800166.31
504900175.56

Download This Route's Data

This route's measurement round is published as open data (CC BY 4.0) in CSV, JSON, and YAML. See About This Measurement for citation guidance.

Download this dataset

Per-route ICMP ping series, released under CC BY 4.0. Uncompressed plain text — no decompression step needed.

Theoretical Fiber Latency

The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Amsterdam (52.37403, 4.88969) and Taipei (25.05306, 121.52639). It does not disclose either facility address.

Physical ReferenceValue
WGS-84 geodesic distance9,467.8 km
Vacuum RTT floor63.16 ms
Standard fiber RTT floor (ng=1.4679n_g=1.4679)92.72 ms
Low-latency fiber material floor92.34 ms
Engineering floor (5% path allowance)97.36 ms
Research 1.33× mapped-fiber reference123.31 ms
Estimated unamplified path loss1988.2 dB
Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers125 / 124
Published RTT inflation over fiber floor1.82×

Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.

Stability & Trend

The current measurement round (2026-08-16T04:07:28Z) collected 50 ICMP echo samples on this route. Distribution statistics from that round:

Round StatisticValue
Minimum RTT163.09 ms
Average RTT168.7 ms
Maximum RTT184.23 ms
Standard deviation4.36 ms
Stdev / average2.6%

RTT trend

Estimated route stability across the selected time window.

Average
168.8 ms
Minimum
167.0 ms
Maximum
170.2 ms
Average loss
0.01%

Route Context

Reverse direction

Fastest routes departing Amsterdam (AMS)

Fastest routes arriving at Taipei (TPE)

Same corridor (Europe → Asia Pacific)

About This Measurement

Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior measured with ICMP echo probes between PoPs. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. None of these values is an SLA.

The measurement round behind this page is published as open data under CC BY 4.0 in the Hats Network latency dataset. Per-pair files are available at /opendata/latency/latest/pairs/ams-tpe.pings.{csv,json,yaml}. When citing, include the route, the measurement round timestamp, and the dataset version — for example: "Hats Network latency dataset, Amsterdam → Taipei round 2026-08-16T04:07:28Z, CC BY 4.0".


Data auto-generated on August 16, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.

On this page