Hats Network | LogoHats Network
NetworkLatencyPairs

Moscow to Marseille Latency, Ping & RTT | AS203314

Moscow to Marseille ping and RTT: 51.1 ms, 0.6 ms jitter, 26.23 ms fiber floor, and 51.3% efficiency across AS203314. Updated 2026-07-19.

πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί This page compares the published ping and round-trip time (RTT) from Moscow (MOW) to πŸ‡«πŸ‡· Marseille (MRS) with vacuum and optical-fiber physical limits.

Latency Summary

MetricValue
RTT51.1 ms
Jitter0.6 ms
Packet Loss0.04%
Standard Fiber Floor26.23 ms
Fiber Efficiency51.3%
Latency TierExcellent
Source RegionEurope
Destination RegionEurope

Theoretical Fiber Latency

The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Moscow (55.75204, 37.61781) and Marseille (43.29695, 5.38107). It does not disclose either facility address.

Physical ReferenceValue
WGS-84 geodesic distance2,678.2 km
Vacuum RTT floor17.87 ms
Standard fiber RTT floor (ng=1.4679n_g=1.4679)26.23 ms
Low-latency fiber material floor26.12 ms
Engineering floor (5% path allowance)27.54 ms
Research 1.33Γ— mapped-fiber reference34.88 ms
Estimated unamplified path loss562.4 dB
Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers36 / 35
Published RTT inflation over fiber floor1.95Γ—

Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.

Stability & Trend

The following estimated indicators summarize route stability for the current publication period and are intended for comparative planning rather than SLA evaluation.

Stability IndicatorValue
Minimum RTT50.5 ms
Median RTT (p50)51 ms
95th percentile RTT (p95)52.1 ms
Maximum RTT52.4 ms
Jitter0.6 ms
Packet loss0.04%

RTT trend

Estimated route stability across the selected time window.

Average
51.1 ms
Minimum
50.5 ms
Maximum
51.4 ms
Average loss
0.01%

Route Context

About This Measurement

Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. Stability indicators are comparative estimates, and none of these values is an SLA.


Data auto-generated on July 19, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.

On this page