Moscow, Russia → Marseille, France RTT
Moscow to Marseille RTT measurement: ICMP echo latency, jitter, packet loss, and route efficiency between Russia and France in round 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z.
🇷🇺 Moscow, Russia (MOW) → 🇫🇷 Marseille, France (MRS)
Measurement round: 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z.
Measurement round 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z for Moscow-to-Marseille returned a 50.7 ms average ICMP echo RTT, with samples from 49.39 ms to 55.36 ms. The 1.41 ms standard deviation and 1.23 ms jitter kept the route in the Excellent latency tier, and all 50 probes were answered with zero packet loss.
Compared with the 26.23 ms straight-line fiber floor, the observed average is 1.93 times higher, putting direct-fiber efficiency at 51.7%. For this round the route ranked 6th among the 19 outbound paths, while the set's median variability, measured as standard deviation relative to average RTT, was 3.08%.
The combination of a tight sub-1.5 ms spread and no loss suggests the Moscow-to-Marseille path is well-behaved for a long European crossing, making this round a useful stability reference for ongoing RTT checks.
Latency Summary
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| RTT | 50.7 ms |
| Jitter | 1.23 ms |
| Packet Loss | 0% |
| Standard Fiber Floor | 26.23 ms |
| Fiber Efficiency | 51.7% |
| Latency Tier | Excellent |
| Source Region | Europe |
| Destination Region | Europe |
Ping Measurement Series
The chart below renders the 50-sample ICMP echo measurement round for this route; an accessible table of every sample is included with the chart.
Ping series: MOW → MRS
50 ICMP echo samples at 100 ms intervals · round 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z · avg 50.7 ± 0.20 ms (SE)
Sample distribution: box = interquartile range (49.8–51.0 ms), median 50.2 ms · whiskers = min–max · diamond = round average · each dot is one measured sample.
How to read this chart
The shaded band spans the measured minimum to maximum RTT of all samples collected up to that point, and the thin line traces the running average. The final position therefore matches the round statistics exactly — the band only widens when a new extreme sample arrives.
The dashed line is the round average, and the shaded band at the bottom is the theoretical fiber-optic floor (26.2 ms) for this route.
Full 50-sample dataset
| Seq | Offset (ms) | RTT (ms) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 50.35 |
| 2 | 100 | 54.10 |
| 3 | 200 | 50.98 |
| 4 | 300 | 49.84 |
| 5 | 400 | 50.72 |
| 6 | 500 | 49.96 |
| 7 | 600 | 49.87 |
| 8 | 700 | 53.25 |
| 9 | 800 | 51.54 |
| 10 | 900 | 50.26 |
| 11 | 1000 | 52.65 |
| 12 | 1100 | 55.36 |
| 13 | 1200 | 51.93 |
| 14 | 1300 | 50.55 |
| 15 | 1400 | 49.81 |
| 16 | 1500 | 49.43 |
| 17 | 1600 | 52.71 |
| 18 | 1700 | 50.49 |
| 19 | 1800 | 49.85 |
| 20 | 1900 | 49.50 |
| 21 | 2000 | 49.86 |
| 22 | 2100 | 49.45 |
| 23 | 2200 | 49.70 |
| 24 | 2300 | 49.61 |
| 25 | 2400 | 49.59 |
| 26 | 2500 | 49.88 |
| 27 | 2600 | 49.60 |
| 28 | 2700 | 49.84 |
| 29 | 2800 | 49.68 |
| 30 | 2900 | 49.39 |
| 31 | 3000 | 51.84 |
| 32 | 3100 | 50.39 |
| 33 | 3200 | 54.05 |
| 34 | 3300 | 51.21 |
| 35 | 3400 | 50.10 |
| 36 | 3500 | 50.21 |
| 37 | 3600 | 49.93 |
| 38 | 3700 | 50.32 |
| 39 | 3800 | 49.76 |
| 40 | 3900 | 51.14 |
| 41 | 4000 | 50.05 |
| 42 | 4100 | 49.52 |
| 43 | 4200 | 49.47 |
| 44 | 4300 | 50.99 |
| 45 | 4400 | 49.84 |
| 46 | 4500 | 50.65 |
| 47 | 4600 | 50.66 |
| 48 | 4700 | 50.96 |
| 49 | 4800 | 50.13 |
| 50 | 4900 | 54.03 |
Download This Route's Data
This route's measurement round is published as open data (CC BY 4.0) in CSV, JSON, and YAML. See About This Measurement for citation guidance.
Download this dataset
Per-route ICMP ping series, released under CC BY 4.0. Uncompressed plain text — no decompression step needed.
Theoretical Fiber Latency
The public physical reference uses the GeoNames city centres for Moscow (55.75204, 37.61781) and Marseille (43.29695, 5.38107). It does not disclose either facility address.
| Physical Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| WGS-84 geodesic distance | 2,678.2 km |
| Vacuum RTT floor | 17.87 ms |
| Standard fiber RTT floor () | 26.23 ms |
| Low-latency fiber material floor | 26.12 ms |
| Engineering floor (5% path allowance) | 27.54 ms |
| Research 1.33× mapped-fiber reference | 34.88 ms |
| Estimated unamplified path loss | 562.4 dB |
| Transparent optical spans / inline amplifiers | 36 / 35 |
| Published RTT inflation over fiber floor | 1.93× |
Attenuation is used to estimate the number of 80 km optical spans; it does not directly slow light. See the full theoretical fiber latency, GeoNames, attenuation, and amplifier methodology.
Stability & Trend
The current measurement round (2026-08-15T04:03:13Z) collected 50 ICMP echo samples on this route. Distribution statistics from that round:
| Round Statistic | Value |
|---|---|
| Minimum RTT | 49.39 ms |
| Average RTT | 50.7 ms |
| Maximum RTT | 55.36 ms |
| Standard deviation | 1.41 ms |
| Stdev / average | 2.8% |
RTT trend
Estimated route stability across the selected time window.
- Average
- 50.7 ms
- Minimum
- 50.3 ms
- Maximum
- 51.2 ms
- Average loss
- 0.02%
Route Context
- Departure PoP: Moscow (MOW)
- Destination PoP: Marseille (MRS)
- Region overview: Europe → Europe
- Full global matrix: Backbone Latency Matrix
- Physical methodology: Theoretical Fiber Latency
Related City-Pair Routes
Reverse direction
- Marseille to Moscow latency and RTT — 51.3 ms
Fastest routes departing Moscow (MOW)
- Moscow to Berlin latency and RTT — 27 ms
- Moscow to Frankfurt latency and RTT — 35 ms
- Moscow to Amsterdam latency and RTT — 39.3 ms
- Moscow to London latency and RTT — 42.4 ms
- Moscow to Paris latency and RTT — 43.9 ms
Fastest routes arriving at Marseille (MRS)
- Paris to Marseille latency and RTT — 8.9 ms
- Frankfurt to Marseille latency and RTT — 17.2 ms
- Amsterdam to Marseille latency and RTT — 19.7 ms
- Berlin to Marseille latency and RTT — 20.5 ms
- London to Marseille latency and RTT — 24.9 ms
Same corridor (Europe → Europe)
- Amsterdam to London latency and RTT — 5.1 ms
- London to Amsterdam latency and RTT — 5.1 ms
- Amsterdam to Frankfurt latency and RTT — 5.9 ms
About This Measurement
Published RTT reflects best-case backbone path behavior measured with ICMP echo probes between PoPs. End-user latency also depends on local access networks, congestion, routing policy, and traffic engineering. None of these values is an SLA.
The measurement round behind this page is published as open data under CC BY 4.0 in the Hats Network latency dataset. Per-pair files are available at /opendata/latency/latest/pairs/mow-mrs.pings.{csv,json,yaml}. When citing, include the route, the measurement round timestamp, and the dataset version — for example: "Hats Network latency dataset, Moscow → Marseille round 2026-08-15T04:03:13Z, CC BY 4.0".
Data auto-generated on August 15, 2026. Explore the full interactive latency matrix or browse more city-pair routes.